Not within the context intended at the time.
Norman! What did you put in my tea?

I thought you’d be happy the Overlook was inclusive to you gheys?
Melton1 Wanted for Pedophilia:
https://i.ibb.co/6cnPmJVr/IMG-0830.jpg
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/Zjxk307CND0

️️️ the OP is a moron
My password is password.

it's not a man in the costume, dum dum
My password is password.

I saw AHS as using sexuality as a metaphor for human lust/desire, yet not in a deriding judgemental way to make it seem debauched as though it was disgusting.
Norman! What did you put in my tea?

LivingDeadBoy️

He made the queer coded bdsm "rubber man" scary in Murder House. The suid belonged tl the gay guys who owned the house before the Harmons moved in.
In Hotel he made Liz Taylor seem somewhat menacing in the first episode.
The Addiction Demon raped Max Greenfield in thr ass with a spiked dildo.
Fidelio♟️

Ahhhhh! But American Horror Story isn’t scary and is produced by an openly gay man and has lots of parts for gay actors. It took a cue from Kubrick’s The Shining and warped it.
This scene in The Shining is not scary and the shock value was deliberately designed to pander to those in the audience at the time, (which would have largely been ignorant and homophobic), who would have been repulsed.
If it was a man eating out some chicks pussy, would it have been seen as shocking/ debauched/scary?
Norman! What did you put in my tea?

LivingDeadBoy️

No, there is nothing homophobic about this scene. The sudden appearance, fetish "mask", and the fact thst they are ghosts and that its sexual activity od any sort, is meant to be "shocking". A common horror trope is using sex in a creepy way. American Horror Story did this a lot in the first two seasons.
Fidelio♟️

Why would I try to edit? It is what I say.
Norman! What did you put in my tea?

It’s all right there, in your post, which needs framing. I’ve screenshotted it in case you try to edit.

Incredible.
You said you just wanted equal rights. ‘Love is love’. Against our better judgement we decided to believe you out of compassion.
Where did I say that? Are you putting words into my mouth?
Your goal appears to remain ignorant. And as for gay pride parades and dirty gyrating and twerking, **** that **** so **** you!
Norman! What did you put in my tea?

Incredible.
You said you just wanted equal rights. ‘Love is love’. Against our better judgement we decided to believe you out of compassion.
And now the mask falls and we see what you ******* were after all along.
We were clued in when you started gyrating in front of our children at your sordid ‘Pride’ festivals, but it’s good to have your goals finally spelled out. Thank you.

The human race needs to be extinguished. It’s an idea of normalcy only and straight pricks are their own worst enemy.
Gayness is an evolved state of being. It means the human existence realm is going to be transcended for them. Have fun ****ting and pissing.
Norman! What did you put in my tea?

The normalcy of straightness is not debatable. Straightness is the norm, otherwise the human race would cease to exist. Gayness is an abnormal aberration, though it might serve some fringe societal purpose.

Normalcy is debatable, but yes, movies were better in the past and gay themed ones were a treasure for those looking for crumbs. Even they were better.
Norman! What did you put in my tea?

Good indeed. Movies were much better when they pandered to normal straight men.

Good!
Norman! What did you put in my tea?

To all straight men, yes.

So the film was pandering to grossed out men? More cheap shots.
Norman! What did you put in my tea?

It says they understand that men are grossed out by two guys buttfucking ‍️

So the film, ( and even book ), was pandering to a base element with its imagery? This says a lot about the intention of the artists.
Norman! What did you put in my tea?

Blowbear is easily the best ghost. I was gutted when he didn’t make a cameo appearance in Doctor Strange, all the other classic ghosts did ‍️
Are King and Kubrick anti gay? I doubt it, but they intuitively understand that men are grossed out by two guys buttfucking, and Wendy was too.
This is multiplied when one of the guys is wearing a bear costume with a buttflap set to ‘open’.

What da hell kinda question is this? Were you raised in a barn in a rural timber camp or something?
Errrrr! Has the sarcasm been lost on you?
Said another way: imperialist western society tends to inculcate homophobia in citizens –even against our better wisdom and saner judgment.
So it was included to repulse the easily shocked and ignorant. A cheap shot if you ask me.
King cleverly stings us with these false values of ours; this is in line with the rest of the novel's intention. Showing up the falsity of white culture.
Errrr! Is that reverse racism?
Norman! What did you put in my tea?

What da hell kinda question is this? Were you raised in a barn in a rural timber camp or something?
Anyway yes there is that scene in the original story. But it is only there to provoke our own societal-bred reactions.
Said another way: imperialist western society tends to inculcate homophobia in citizens –even against our better wisdom and saner judgment.
King cleverly stings us with these false values of ours; this is in line with the rest of the novel's intention. Showing up the falsity of white culture.
Paul P. Powell, Pool Player