<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[For God&#x27;s sake, no stupid US remake.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Excalibur</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>jh66</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 13, 2016 03:52 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">McHollywood is capable, with it's international casts and crews, of making some incredible films, but current trends are for pathetic, pale remakes and now all-female casts. Pandering at it's worst.<br />
A remake of this classic, admittedly with errors and flaws, not least the inexplicable continuity errors (Gawain and Llancelot's duel scen which jumps), would most likely be cheap and stupid.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194675/for-god-s-sake-no-stupid-us-remake</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:27:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194675.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:12 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For God&#x27;s sake, no stupid US remake. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>chilone</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 23, 2016 12:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">.and you are free to not watch it.<br />
I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635591</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635591</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For God&#x27;s sake, no stupid US remake. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>pol-edra</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 14, 2016 10:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Lol. I never said they were weirdos though! ^^<br />
"<br />
Occasionally<br />
I'm callous and strange."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635590</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635590</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For God&#x27;s sake, no stupid US remake. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Navaros</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 14, 2016 09:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Wow, I had no idea that the blacksmiths of ancient history were weirdos too!  Thanks for the history lesson.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635589</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635589</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For God&#x27;s sake, no stupid US remake. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>pol-edra</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 09, 2016 01:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Then again, the use of nipple armor in film may very well have nothing to do with some weird director fetish, but rather with the costuming department's knowledge and taste for ancient armor which do include quite a number of stylized representations of nipples and pecs. Looking to the past, to history and archaeology, to draw inspiration in making a movie, is not isolated incident; it is, on the contrary, pretty common.<br />
See a Celtic example of "nipple armour" here:<br />
<a href="http://musee-archeologienationale.fr/?q=objet/cuirasse-de-marmesse" rel="nofollow ugc">http://musee-archeologienationale.fr/?q=objet/cuirasse-de-marmesse</a><br />
"<br />
Occasionally<br />
I'm callous and strange."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635588</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635588</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For God&#x27;s sake, no stupid US remake. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Navaros</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 28, 2016 08:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">joel schumacher has<br />
already<br />
somewhat remade this film by putting nipple-armor into his Batman films.  I'm surprised that he didn't direct this film as well, given both directors' strange creepy love for nipple-armor.  The odds of two different directors both being that weird seem low.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635587</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635587</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For God&#x27;s sake, no stupid US remake. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>srb-3</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 11, 2016 12:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Remake is dead in favor of new King Arthur movie.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635586</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635586</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For God&#x27;s sake, no stupid US remake. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jh66</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 15, 2016 10:51 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">True, I was more thinking and typing out loud, as there was a remake project in the last few years (Singer?) that thankfully was shelved.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635585</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635585</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For God&#x27;s sake, no stupid US remake. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>panzermeyer44</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 15, 2016 06:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Who is doing a remake? There is a King Arthur film being made by Guy Ritchie but it is an entirely different interpretation of the Mallory source material. It's not a remake of "Excalibur".</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635584</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1635584</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:13 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>