<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I&#x27;m a little confused.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Galaxy of Terror</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Bellator86</strong> — <em>11 years ago(December 07, 2014 11:36 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'm a little confused.<br />
IMDB says the original aspect ratio for this is 1.85:1 (theatrical release). I also find this information elsewhere. I have a DVD (IPD10558) in 4:3 (1.33:1), which I obviously assume was in some way cropped from the theatrical 1.85:1 version. Shout Factory also has a DVD, and it is also in 4:3.<br />
However, Shout Factory also has a Blu-ray of it, which is in 16:9 (1.78:1). So I assumed this was more true to the original aspect ratio, since it is closer. But then I see some screenshots of the Blu-ray, and it is actually cropped from the 4:3 version I have.<br />
So my question is: was the original movie actually in 4:3? This means the Blu-ray was cropped for 16:9 TVs, which is common, and my DVD is in the original. This makes sense. Or was it originally in 1.85:1, meaning my DVD is cropped on the sides, and the Blu-ray cropped both on the sides and top/bottom? The Blu-ray is a lot prettier than the DVD, so they couldn't have used the DVD cut as source of transfer. So what the heck.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194813/i-m-a-little-confused</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 04:23:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/194813.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:08:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I&#x27;m a little confused. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:08:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Bellator86</strong> — <em>11 years ago(February 09, 2015 05:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ah yes, that makes sense, I hadn't thought of that. A while back I contacted Shout Factory's customer support with the question, which in turn sent the question to the DVD producer. He said that he was "sure it was run theatrically at 1.85:1" which I took for it being shot in it, but it could very well mean it was matted instead. Thanks.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1636852</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1636852</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:08:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I&#x27;m a little confused. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:08:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Tuco-Benedicto-Maria-Ramirez</strong> — <em>11 years ago(February 09, 2015 02:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It was probably shot open matte.  So, it is shot in the academy ratio (1.33:1) but framed for cinema projection (1.85:1).  Then, when the film is shown in the theatre, the projectionist would matte the film (block the top and bottom of the screen) to show the 1.85:1 ratio.  Many films were shot this way.  I've not seen the Blu-ray yet, but I would imagine it is true to what was shown in cinemas.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1636851</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1636851</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:08:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>