<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[A Zulawski masterpiece]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Possession</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>jriddle73</strong> — <em>17 years ago(April 19, 2008 09:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Back in 1980, Polish director Andrej Zulawski had an idea for a movie. Trying to sum it up, he probably made it sound overly "arty" and convoluted so he simplified his pitchhe told an American distributor it was about a beautiful girl who gets <em>beep</em> by an octopus. What's even more astonishing about that tale is that the distributor bought it and ponied up part of the money Zulawski needed to make the picture. The result was POSSESSION, starring Isabelle Adjani and Sam <a href="http://Neill.My" rel="nofollow ugc">Neill.My</a> cinematic studies were rather extensive last yearprobably a few hundred movies, in allbut POSSESSION was one of the absolute best I saw all year, and one of the most intense movies I've<br />
ever<br />
seen. I felt utterly drained after watching it. It's exhausting, to be sure, but in a good way.<br />
The aforementioned "octopus" wasn't really an octopus but it was a monster with a lot of arms, and it did <em>beep</em> Isabelle Adjani. The movie isn't "about" that, though. It's actually a very intense, visceral study of the disintegration of a once-functional marriage. Art reflected lifePOSSESSION was made right after the traumatic collapse of Zulawski's own marriage. His film offers an excruciatingly detailed and unflinching map of the emotional landscape of two people whose relationship has disintegrated and left them in absolute agony, their lives in pieces, and the two of them trapped in a sort of emotional limbo. They can't stand to be together. They can't stand to be apart. Isabelle Adjani, lost in her pain and seemingly verging on madness, gives birth to a monster, a literal physical representation of her emotional state. At first, it's in a constant state of evolution. She sequesters it away, cares for it, nurtures it, and yes, is <em>beep</em> by it, until it finishes its last transformation. That transformation is a major plot twist. It's the sort of thing I should have seen coming, but totally missed until the big reveal at the end. It is said that a picture speaks a thousand words. The reveal near the end of this ups the word-count substantially.<br />
And that isn't even the end, yet. Zulawski sees the end of this relationship as something akin to the end of the world. And, in the movie, this is literally the case.<br />
(How's<br />
that<br />
for a hook?)<br />
Zulawski shot and edited the film in a raw, frenetic style. The camera, as agitated and unstable as the characters, is forever moving, moving, moving, covering most of the interaction between the two leads in tight, claustrophobic shots that bore in so closely we can almost count the pores in their faces. Adjani, in particular, has a remarkable face for film, and Zulawski makes perhaps the best use of it of any of her directors over the years. For their part, Neill and Adjani are just excellent, and in a pair of extraordinarily demanding parts that could have been disastrous in lesser hands (and, one suspects, would have sent most thespians running home, crying for momma). Adjani was unnerved, even horrified, by the intensity of the film, dubbing it "psychological pornography." The Cannes Film Festival awarded her Best Actress for her work on it.<br />
POSSESSION is rather long, just over two hours. Back in the mid-'80s, it was released on video in the U.S. in a substantially butchered versionthe distributors apparently tried to re-edit it into something like an exploitation film. Needless to say, it quickly died (I can't even imagine who would have come up with such a project, or how they'd have gone about it). Luckily, at the dawn of DVD, good ol' Anchor Bayback before they'd become a recurring joke/tragedy themselvescame along and saved it, releasing it in its complete form in the U.S. for the first time, accompanied by a very good Zulawski commentary track. I bought this one virtually blind last year, having read a single laudatory review that told almost nothing of the plot. I'm very glad I did.<br />
In a sign of how badly Anchor Bay has stumbled since selling out to Starz, POSSESSION has been allowed to go out of print and stay that way for quite some time. But they do offer us ROSEANNE: THE COMPLETE 5th SEASON! A real monster, to be sure, but one that <em>beep</em> us, instead of Isabelle Adjani.<br />
"The Dig"<br />
<a href="http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/2008/12/possession-1981.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/2008/12/possession-1981.html</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/195396/a-zulawski-masterpiece</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:36:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/195396.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:41:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jriddle73</strong> — <em>3 years ago(October 10, 2022 07:14 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">An interesting notion of "saints"!<br />
"The Dig"<br />
<a href="http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642369</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642369</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>popularru</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 21, 2013 01:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I deeply love this film. After reading this topic I thought that this film is very carnal. But every person in this film shows that he don't know what it means. They even seem like saints.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642368</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642368</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jriddle73</strong> — <em>11 years ago(August 22, 2014 12:42 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I thought so too.<br />
"The Dig"<br />
<a href="http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642367</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642367</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>zachhasbro</strong> — <em>13 years ago(February 27, 2013 08:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">yes its a masterpiece</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642366</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642366</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jriddle73</strong> — <em>13 years ago(February 27, 2013 05:35 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">bump<br />
"The Dig"<br />
<a href="http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642365</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642365</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642364</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642364</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>paguy27</strong> — <em>12 years ago(April 08, 2013 04:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"This film is a curious little oddity, but most certainly not a masterpiece by any stretch of imagination. For one thing, the acting is simply awful. Adjani gives one of the most annoyingly grating performances of all time. She either screams or throws herself about like a lunatic in every scene she's in, showing all the range of a baboon in heat. Sam Neil isn't much better, veering as he does between bewilderment and insanity and back again with absolutely nothing in between.<br />
It doesn't work as a horror due to the utter absence of suspense, but neither does it work as an effective marital break-up drama, lacking the gravitas and subtlety needed for such an undertaking. The dialogue is embarrassingly inane and provides no insight whatsoever. Furthermore, there's no arc or pacing of any sort. The characters are as hysterical and nutty at the start as they are at the end and we never develop any empathy or understanding for them. 127 minutes is far too long to expect us to put up with such ridiculous histrionics. I can see how the film may have actually benefited from the wholesale cuts in the American version.<br />
Another big problem is that it's not well photographed and its visuals are extremely bland. There's no effective lighting or contrast, and for all of Zulawski's odd angles and restless camera-work, its aesthetic remains exceptionally plain and off-putting. There's simply no atmosphere of any sort. It looks like an average TV movie.<br />
It's kind of frustrating, because there are some good ideas floating beneath the surface. The doppelganger concept is interesting and the monster copulation and subway miscarriage are appropriately icky and surreal."<br />
My vote for dumbest <em>beep</em> I've ever read on IMDB.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642363</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642363</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>franzkabuki</strong> — <em>13 years ago(March 10, 2013 01:09 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Argument by appeal to authority. Dismissed.<br />
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642362</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642362</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642361</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642361</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Lawdog1527</strong> — <em>13 years ago(July 07, 2012 10:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes, idiots do find most things amusing.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642360</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642360</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jriddle73</strong> — <em>13 years ago(July 07, 2012 08:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You're an idiot, my friend.<br />
And<br />
So what you're saying is FoxNews controls the thoughts an minds of all modern culture and is attempting to subvert the analysis of a 30 year old French film?<br />
Most amusing.<br />
"The Dig"<br />
<a href="http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642359</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642359</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Lawdog1527</strong> — <em>13 years ago(July 07, 2012 04:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">So what you're saying is FoxNews controls the thoughts an minds of all modern culture and is attempting to subvert the analysis of a 30 year old French film?<br />
And that you've somehow personally ascended beyond that and therefore are intellectually superior to anyone who disagrees with you or doesn't share your same ideologies.<br />
Furthermore, once a film is given an award such as the D'Or it is unimpeachable from than point forward.<br />
You're an idiot, my friend.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642358</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642358</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dobyzhee</strong> — <em>13 years ago(July 07, 2012 01:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">my thoughts exactly<br />
someone throwing themselves around and screaming..<br />
If you thought that was good acting, then my 5 year old could win an oscar..</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642357</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642357</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jriddle73</strong> — <em>13 years ago(July 07, 2012 09:23 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That's the sort of review that could only happen in the era of Fox News, when everyone suddenly feels entitled to their own reality, whether it has any connection to actual reality or not.<br />
On this other Foxworld, in this strange other version of POSSESSION, Isabelle Adjani's work "is simply awful" and "one of the most annoyingly grating performances of all time"; in the real world, the performance earned her best actress honors from both the Cannes film festival and the Caesar Awards (the French Academy Awards). On Foxworld, this version of POSSESSION "looks like an average TV movie," which means television in Foxworld is a<br />
hell<br />
of a lot better than in the real one; in the real one, the film put director Zulawski in competition for the Palm D'Or at Cannes, the festival's highest honor. I feel sorry for the people in Foxworld; by being there, they've managed to miss a great movie.<br />
"The Dig"<br />
<a href="http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642356</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642356</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>deRider84</strong> — <em>13 years ago(July 03, 2012 08:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This film is a curious little oddity, but most certainly not a masterpiece by any stretch of imagination. For one thing, the acting is simply awful. Adjani gives one of the most annoyingly grating performances of all time. She either screams or throws herself about like a lunatic in every scene she's in, showing all the range of a baboon in heat. Sam Neil isn't much better, veering as he does between bewilderment and insanity and back again with absolutely nothing in between.<br />
It doesn't work as a horror due to the utter absence of suspense, but neither does it work as an effective marital break-up drama, lacking the gravitas and subtlety needed for such an undertaking. The dialogue is embarrassingly inane and provides no insight whatsoever. Furthermore, there's no arc or pacing of any sort. The characters are as hysterical and nutty at the start as they are at the end and we never develop any empathy or understanding for them. 127 minutes is far too long to expect us to put up with such ridiculous histrionics. I can see how the film may have actually benefited from the wholesale cuts in the American version.<br />
Another big problem is that it's not well photographed and its visuals are extremely bland. There's no effective lighting or contrast, and for all of Zulawski's odd angles and restless camera-work, its aesthetic remains exceptionally plain and off-putting. There's simply no atmosphere of any sort. It looks like an average TV movie.<br />
It's kind of frustrating, because there are some good ideas floating beneath the surface. The doppelganger concept is interesting and the monster copulation and subway miscarriage are appropriately icky and surreal.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642355</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642355</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jriddle73</strong> — <em>13 years ago(May 19, 2012 11:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes.<br />
"The Dig"<br />
<a href="http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642354</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642354</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Spallone_Spikane</strong> — <em>15 years ago(February 11, 2011 10:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Zulawski is now one of my top 5 favorite directors. Another Horror film he made that was sadly overlooked was Diabel (The Devil). That film is evil incarnate. The print for the Polarts dvd is of course terrible, but you should check it out nonetheless. Mondo Vision has the rights to release Diabel, and if you know Mondo Vision, you know that they will do justice to the film. The problem is that they will release the film sometime in 2013. Oh, well.<br />
Mondo Vision is planning on releasing On A Silver Globe this year! Amazing! And I haven't even seen the film yet!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642353</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642353</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dalldorfw</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 20, 2013 04:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">At this point, I don't remember why I brought it up. I'd probably have to look though all the posts to remember why that made sense.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642352</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642352</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jriddle73</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 20, 2013 04:41 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">A great movie, to be sure. Not sure how it ties into POSSESSION, though.<br />
"The Dig"<br />
<a href="http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642351</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642351</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dalldorfw</strong> — <em>15 years ago(January 25, 2011 06:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Why hasn't anyone mentioned Matthew Bright's 'Freeway.'</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642350</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642350</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jriddle73</strong> — <em>15 years ago(January 01, 2011 05:07 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Another one to add to your list:<br />
Jess Franco's SUCCUBUS (1968). Makes a nice companion piece to POSSESSION. It's also about a "possessed" woman, it doesn't make a whole lotta sense if you take the plot at face value and it was also filmed in Berlin!<br />
A gem, to be sure! I'm not sure it really works as a "companion piece to POSSESSION, but it is a somewhat similar theme, and a damn good movie.<br />
"The Dig"<br />
<a href="http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642349</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642349</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642348</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642348</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642347</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642347</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A Zulawski masterpiece on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>monty-57</strong> — <em>17 years ago(November 05, 2008 03:52 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Another one to add to your list:<br />
Jess Franco's SUCCUBUS (1968). Makes a nice companion piece to POSSESSION. It's also about a "possessed" woman, it doesn't make a whole lotta sense if you take the plot at face value and it was also filmed in Berlin!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642346</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642346</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:42:12 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>