<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Liked it Because it was a good Very Low Budget Movie]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Possession</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>npfares</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 31, 2016 11:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I just recently watched this movie and I have to say that I liked it because it was low budget.  Not because it could have been better but because it showed the 'B-movie' type of quality that many 'cult' followers decided to show in this movie.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/195410/liked-it-because-it-was-a-good-very-low-budget-movie</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 10:26:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/195410.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:44:13 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liked it Because it was a good Very Low Budget Movie on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:44:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>joshuacarpino</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 16, 2017 01:57 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">um,okay. i loved it because it was a brilliant,beautifully photographed masterpiece.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642463</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642463</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:44:14 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>