<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Can somone enlight me please? Did she created an imaginary man to cope with the lost of the real one?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Possession</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>v-thea</strong> — <em>11 years ago(October 22, 2014 08:48 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Can somone enlight me please? Did she created an imaginary man to cope with the lost of the real one?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/195450/can-somone-enlight-me-please-did-she-created-an-imaginary-man-to-cope-with-the-lost-of-the-real-one</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:51:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/195450.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:53:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can somone enlight me please? Did she created an imaginary man to cope with the lost of the real one? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:53:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>stitchesaresore</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 25, 2016 12:11 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Excellent summary.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642986</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642986</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:53:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can somone enlight me please? Did she created an imaginary man to cope with the lost of the real one? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:53:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ntd500</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 12, 2016 09:58 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks for the explanation. That explains also why Anna's doppelgnger was his idealized version of his wife.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642985</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642985</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:53:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can somone enlight me please? Did she created an imaginary man to cope with the lost of the real one? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:53:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>shkayla</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 22, 2016 01:32 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you very much <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642984</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642984</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:53:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can somone enlight me please? Did she created an imaginary man to cope with the lost of the real one? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:53:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fleshrequiem</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 21, 2016 08:16 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Wonderfully stated on all accounts! Reading this was an absolute joy! <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642983</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642983</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:53:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can somone enlight me please? Did she created an imaginary man to cope with the lost of the real one? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:53:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>shkayla</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 21, 2016 06:45 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">She didn't created an imaginary man. When she walked into the church she started to masturbate on the Jesus' image. It was some sort of sick immaculate conception. I guess, she didn't want to do it, because she moaned indignantly, but she did it anyway. Then the famous subway scene started. There, in a subway, she miscarried a horrible tentacled monster. This monster is the symbol of her lust and closed desires, she called it 'sister Faith', because her faith is perverted and gross. Since then she had been 'bringing it up' by feeding with parts of the detectives' bodies and by having sex with it. It became anthropomorphic at first, but gradually it became an ideal version of her husband - Anna had been in love with him although she betrayed him and screamed at him all the time. She wanted him to be perfect, to be more sexually satisfying, but it was impossible so she was angry at him. But the making of It saved her from frustration. Finally, she got what she wanted to.<br />
Anyway, the whole movie is a metaphor of divorce. And both doppelgangers (Helen and unnamed Anna's creature) were left with Bob as a new inerrant version of his real parents. That means that real Anna and Mark made up for their son, but it wasn't sincerely. Children always feel things like that. Bob preferred to drown himself than to see his new 'father' and 'mother'.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642982</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1642982</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:53:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>