<![CDATA[orgasmically good]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Taps

swellwrench — 19 years ago(September 14, 2006 05:04 AM)

one of the strongest cinematic efforts to which I've ever beared witness. justwow. agree/disagree?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/195735/orgasmically-goodRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 22:41:05 GMTWed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:20 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to orgasmically good on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:28 GMT]]>MikeO_64 — 9 years ago(May 29, 2016 07:42 PM)

I realize it's 10 years old but..troll much?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645870https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645870Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to orgasmically good on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:27 GMT]]>jmd26_0 — 16 years ago(July 25, 2009 10:37 PM)

Plausibility issues aside I would agree it is a cracking good story well told.
Not a great film, but entertaining as hell.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645869https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645869Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to orgasmically good on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:26 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645868https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645868Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to orgasmically good on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:25 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645867https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645867Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to orgasmically good on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:24 GMT]]>mikeclaw — 19 years ago(January 30, 2007 10:38 AM)

It's OK, but not as good as you're selling it. The plot isn't meant to be taken literally it's sort of a modern urban "Lord of the Flies" allegory. And it's OK.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645866https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645866Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to orgasmically good on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:23 GMT]]>HotPinkHooligan — 19 years ago(January 06, 2007 05:01 PM)

I really liked it.It was well-though out, and over the top(Which I like).
Also, given my age (16), I found it inspiring. I mean, we CAN make a difference. So long as we don't meet an untimely deathcough Moreland.
yo ho, yo ho
myspace.com/kimberlyduwe

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645865https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645865Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to orgasmically good on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:22 GMT]]>BennyB678 — 19 years ago(January 06, 2007 04:57 PM)

I found the entire premise of this movie utterly rediculous. A child in this movie was killed defending a military academy because it was being replaced with condos? If this occurred in real life it would rank as one of the greatest tragedies in the history of our country.
The reason I think this movie garners the attention it does is because it has an exceptionally great cast that went on to great careers such as Cruise, Hutton, and Penn while supported by very good established actors like Scott and Cox.
Overall, the premise of this movie is awful. Freedom, democracy, equalitythese are things you fight and die for, not to stop yur military academy from being replaced by condos.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645864https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645864Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to orgasmically good on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:21 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645863https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1645863Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:42:21 GMT