<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Can we get a sequel?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Thing</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>tkell31</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 26, 2016 07:21 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I know it would be tough to follow up, the prequel isn't bad, but with all the crappy movies out there getting 2s, 3s etc how about someone pick this up where it left off?  Small scale it could just be a rescue group that gets caught up in the Thing's trap, larger scale it somehow got to a town, and even larger scale it gets back to the mainland.  I would hate to see it butchered, but this was one of my favorite movies growing up and it would be nice to get some more of the human imitating thing.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/196654/can-we-get-a-sequel</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:14:30 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/196654.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:51 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can we get a sequel? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:03:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Blue Wave</strong> — <em>3 years ago(October 06, 2022 01:14 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I would like one sequel.  However I think only one sequel is needed.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653994</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653994</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:03:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can we get a sequel? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:03:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>preachcaleb</strong> — <em>4 years ago(November 17, 2021 02:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Agreed. The prequel seemed to lose sight of the paranoia and slow burn of The Thing's tactics.<br />
So many stories, so little time.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653993</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653993</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:03:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can we get a sequel? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:03:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Tech Wizard</strong> — <em>4 years ago(November 11, 2021 12:20 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That's wonderful <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f60c.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--relieved" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":relieved:" alt="😌" /><br />
I didn't connect with any onscreen character or actor though<img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f641.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_frowning_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":slightly_frowning_face:" alt="🙁" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653992</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653992</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:03:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can we get a sequel? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:03:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>NZer</strong> — <em>4 years ago(November 11, 2021 12:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The new Thing was just a nasty little aggressive alien from the start.<br />
Exactly why I liked it.  I'm also a fan of Joel Edgerton, and I thought the rest of the cast were fine.  It wasn't as tense as the original, but I still enjoyed it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653991</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653991</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:03:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can we get a sequel? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:03:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Tech Wizard</strong> — <em>4 years ago(November 11, 2021 12:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I didn't like it at first. I saw it recently and it is pretty disgusting. In the prequel The Thing is a vicious killing machine than the original movie. The original, it did sneak attacks until it was big enough and cornered. The new Thing was just a nasty little aggressive alien from the start.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653990</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653990</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:03:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can we get a sequel? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>NZer</strong> — <em>4 years ago(November 10, 2021 06:03 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I like it too!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653989</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653989</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can we get a sequel? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>AnthonyRocks</strong> — <em>4 years ago(November 10, 2021 06:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The 2011 Prequel is very unpopular although I myself actually like it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653988</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653988</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can we get a sequel? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SimmyThompson</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 11, 2017 01:09 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This movie does not need a sequel. If you want more of The Thing just go watch the prequel.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653987</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653987</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can we get a sequel? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tkell31</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 30, 2017 12:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">How about we find out what happened to Kate as well?  Kind of hoping she found a way to make it out, but not much basis for that hope.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653986</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653986</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can we get a sequel? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Tom_Rocks</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 29, 2017 11:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Here is my own Sequel Idea below!<br />
"In January of 1983, an American Rescue Team of 7 people arrive at the burned remains of "OUTPOST 31" where they find the frozen dead bodies of MacReady and Childs. They want to take the 2 bodies back to McMurdo Base but because a large storm is lying between them and McMurdo, they decide to head to another nearby American Base called "OUTPOST 28" which consists of 12 people and stay there until the storm passes over them. However, while there the 2 bodies of MacReady and Childs both transform into monsters beginning the madness all over again. Then to make matters even worse, a 10-Person Soviet Military Team arrives at "OUTPOST 28" with the intention of capturing the monster by any means necessary and killing anyone who gets in their way."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653985</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653985</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can we get a sequel? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>andy_boy_2000</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 29, 2017 07:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't want this movie tainted for me which really happens when a movie franchise is rebooted. Love The Thing!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653984</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653984</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can we get a sequel? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>gbean2397</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 09, 2017 06:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">My idea for a sequel would be almost like<br />
Aliens<br />
, it being a direct sequel, with MacReady and Childs as returning characters. I'd set it in McMurdo Station in Antarctica, as it would still retain the claustrophobic atmosphere, but also bring the threat of the Thing one step closer to reaching civilization. And as I would in my own monster/outbreak stories, I'd have a human villain - a high-ranking military scientist - to act as a foil to the protagonists, and have him end up being infected into the final Thing for the climax.<br />
And P.S., I agree the prequel is not that bad, I do salute the filmmakers for trying to not go the route of simply<br />
remaking<br />
the 1982 film, rather going for making a prequel.<br />
Now it'd be cool to see a sequel to the 1982 film be made, cause then<br />
The Thing<br />
could potentially be called a trilogy, or tetralogy if you count the 1951 film.<br />
The Thing<br />
(2011) /<br />
The Thing<br />
(1982) /<br />
The Thing: Outbreak</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653983</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653983</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can we get a sequel? on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653982</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1653982</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:02:52 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>