<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Update]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Cujo</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Legendary_Badass</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 20, 2016 03:38 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Update<br />
: Video Review<br />
Been meaning to get around to seeing Cujo for years, and I must say I thought the film was incredible (will add my video review when I shoot and upload it). Imagine my surprise when I check in at IMDB to rate the film a 9/10 and see it with a score of only 6/10.<br />
So much going for this from the strong performances, the believable action and stunts, Jan De Bont's camera work, the intense percussion score, but most of all I like the story.<br />
I had mistakenly been told this was about the family pet going rabid, but the actual story was far less simple and frankly brilliant. There's a setup and payoff for everything from the mom and son being left at home, even for the mail man not dropping by. I especially like how the mother being the adulterer seems to make her free game for the dog, keeping with the horror tradition of the transgressors getting karma. Loved the slow motion sequence at the end. There's really not much to fault it over. I suppose the dad losing a marketing account over the product being seemingly poisonous doesn't totally add up, but minor complaint.<br />
Taking its sweet time to get to the carnage gives the viewer a better relationship with the victims. We see how the event changes them after having experienced their normal routine. Well done.<br />
THE MOST ORIGINAL YOUTUBE CHANNEL YOU'RE NOT WATCHING:<br />
<a href="http://bit.ly/1pPzoBc" rel="nofollow ugc">http://bit.ly/1pPzoBc</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/197039/update</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 07:22:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/197039.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:12:17 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Update on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:12:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>minasituation</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 22, 2016 07:20 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Horror movies chronically have lower ratings than other genres. It's just a tricky genre. But the film is fantastic.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1658021</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1658021</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:12:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Update on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:12:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>john-88957</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 20, 2016 11:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yea it's crazy seeing this at 6.0.. First time seeing this in 10 years and still the classic I remember it being.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1658020</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1658020</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:12:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>