<![CDATA[Surprised they didn't give this one the 3d treatment]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Halloween III: Season of the Witch

Tank-McQuade — 9 years ago(September 26, 2016 10:24 PM)

Cause around that time we had Friday part 3 in 3d, jaws 3d, etc

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/197078/surprised-they-didn-t-give-this-one-the-3d-treatmentRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 06:27:30 GMTThu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:16 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised they didn't give this one the 3d treatment on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:23 GMT]]>مع السلامة — 1 year ago(August 26, 2024 09:48 AM)

Even the creators knew not to waste even more of their money on this ****!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659256https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659256Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised they didn't give this one the 3d treatment on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:22 GMT]]>DrDanielChallis — 9 years ago(October 14, 2016 07:23 AM)

I know Romero is coming back around to his Dead films to do this - he just did a limited showing of Dawn 78' in 3D - I heard that was excellent, but extremely time consuming.
If not in 3D, what I would really love would be able to sit in one of those D-box seats, and have the thing vibrate and scare the beep out of me during the normal 2D showing

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659255https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659255Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised they didn't give this one the 3d treatment on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:21 GMT]]>Doom — 9 years ago(September 29, 2016 05:41 AM)

Both of those films didn't even come close to making back their budgets
I thought both those films turned a big profit, no?
Wait a minute who am I here?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659254https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659254Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised they didn't give this one the 3d treatment on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:20 GMT]]>glennhead-61166 — 9 years ago(September 29, 2016 02:36 AM)

The Neilkens sucked! THEY SUCKED!!!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659253https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659253Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised they didn't give this one the 3d treatment on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:19 GMT]]>Tank-McQuade — 9 years ago(September 27, 2016 10:11 PM)

The nelkins were fine as they were

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659252https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659252Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised they didn't give this one the 3d treatment on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:18 GMT]]>YippeeKiYay_MF — 9 years ago(September 27, 2016 09:13 PM)

They could've at least 3D-ed the Nelkins
I'll be good I swear I'll never see a movie ever again.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659251https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659251Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised they didn't give this one the 3d treatment on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:17 GMT]]>dave626 — 9 years ago(September 27, 2016 04:36 AM)

Too expensive and risky. Both of those films didn't even come close to making back their budgets, neither did Amityville 3D which is why 3D didn't make a comeback until recently. And they all had the main advertised character or establishment of the previous films. Friday had Jason, Jaws had the shark and Amityville was still the house. Whereas Halloween III didn't have Michael. It really would've made it worse and there would've only been a handful of scenes where it would've been worth it. The bugs, the misfire, etc.
"He came home." - Dr. Sam Loomis from the original HalloweeN

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659250https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659250Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:33:17 GMT