<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[extremely underrated, unfairly maligned classic film]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Halloween III: Season of the Witch</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>lukejbarnett</strong> — <em>3 years ago(October 28, 2022 03:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">and we all know the only reason why its maligned is bc it was a departure for the halloween films, no michael myers, completely different storyline than parts 1 and 2. big deal, this is not a bad thing.<br />
it's not a wrong thing to make a separate halloween movie than the other halloween films as a matter of fact this film shouldn't be connected, lumped in with any of the other halloween films bc there is no connection in story or characters or anything with any of the other halloween films.<br />
the makers of this film, were they trying to tacitly, ostensibly connect this film with the other 2 just to make more money?<br />
lukejbarnett</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/197090/extremely-underrated-unfairly-maligned-classic-film</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:37:03 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/197090.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:36:20 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to extremely underrated, unfairly maligned classic film on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:36:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Guest?</strong> — <em>3 years ago(October 28, 2022 05:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The risk remains with the player.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659440</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659440</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:36:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to extremely underrated, unfairly maligned classic film on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:36:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MissMargoChanning</strong> — <em>3 years ago(October 28, 2022 03:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I second that emotion!<br />
As for his post, for once, I agree with him on something. This movie is "underrated, unfairly maligned".<br />
I save it for Halloween night most years, but since Halloween is on Moday this year, I believe I'll watch it this weekend for fun. <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f383.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--jack_o_lantern" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":jack_o_lantern:" alt="🎃" /><img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f44d.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--+1" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":+1:" alt="👍" /><br />
You asked a pretty question; I've given you the ugly answer.<br />
Fasten Your Seatbelts….<br />
It's Going To Be A Bumpy Night!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659439</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659439</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:36:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to extremely underrated, unfairly maligned classic film on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:36:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Woodyanders</strong> — <em>3 years ago(October 28, 2022 03:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I call 'em like I see 'em. And the way I see it Luke is a goddamn ****tard.<br />
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659438</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659438</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:36:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to extremely underrated, unfairly maligned classic film on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:36:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Adios</strong> — <em>3 years ago(October 28, 2022 03:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yup. You swore at him and called him a **** tard even though you agreed with him.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659437</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659437</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:36:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to extremely underrated, unfairly maligned classic film on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:36:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Woodyanders</strong> — <em>3 years ago(October 28, 2022 03:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You made a similar post saying basically the same **** last year.<br />
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659436</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1659436</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:36:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>