<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Love this movie. ONE flaw nearly does it in, though.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Terms of Endearment</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>johnm-dalton</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 12, 2016 07:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I love this film. The relationship between Emma and Aurora is the best and most real portrayal of an intense mother/daughter dynamic I've ever seen. The Nicholson is at his Jack best. The screenplay is brilliant in how it economically fits 32 years into two hours of screentime.<br />
The problem? THE MUSIC! I really don't mind the score itself. It's how frequently certain part of it repeat and how LOUD it is. It seems we hear the same thing every five minutes. It really take you out of it, and makes a fine, classy movie seem like pure cheese.<br />
I wish James L. Brooks could go back a la George Lucas and correct that.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/197262/love-this-movie-one-flaw-nearly-does-it-in-though</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 18:21:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/197262.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 01:03:03 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>