<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Which type for a new Airwolf?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Airwolf</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>ep573</strong> — <em>13 years ago(January 05, 2013 01:32 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If Airwolf ever saw a remake, what model would you like to see as the new "Lady"?<br />
Not that there is anything wrong with the Bell 222the original Airwolf was undoubtedly one of the coolest looking aircraft to appear on tv or film. But if you were trying to update the series, my personal choice would be the Sikorsky S76A<br />
<a href="http://www.sikorsky.com/StaticFiles/Sikorsky/Assets/images/News/2012/H" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.sikorsky.com/StaticFiles/Sikorsky/Assets/images/News/2012/H</a> elijet.JPG</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/197622/which-type-for-a-new-airwolf</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 13:09:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/197622.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 01:50:46 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Which type for a new Airwolf? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 01:50:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Critomaton</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 12, 2015 05:32 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Pretty sure the Sikorsky S76 already appeared on<br />
Airwolf<br />
as HX-1.  Spoiler alert:<br />
Airwolf blew it out of the sky.<br />
If there is to be an<br />
Airwolf<br />
reboot they should just use the Comanche, Sikorsky's intended successor to the Apache that got killed due to defense budget cuts.  They could paint it some cool colors, maybe something like Austin Powers' 747.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1663862</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1663862</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 01:50:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Which type for a new Airwolf? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 01:50:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mikesd-1</strong> — <em>10 years ago(May 07, 2015 09:32 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Switch to the 422.<br />
Sikorsky helicopters tend to fall down</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1663861</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1663861</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 01:50:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Which type for a new Airwolf? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 01:50:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DarkTheater</strong> — <em>11 years ago(September 26, 2014 09:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'd stick with the 222 and give it more detail. It was such a perfect body to build Airwolf on.<br />
BLACK BAR</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1663860</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1663860</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 01:50:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Which type for a new Airwolf? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 01:50:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>frosted_one</strong> — <em>13 years ago(February 17, 2013 05:15 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Stick with the 222 just update inside. The Sikorsky doesn't look much different<br />
(and your image is just a tad to huge)</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1663859</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1663859</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 01:50:47 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>