<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[This message has been deleted.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Birdy</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/198201/this-message-has-been-deleted</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 19:15:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/198201.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 03:11:28 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This message has been deleted. on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 03:11:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>horatiohellpop</strong> — <em>18 years ago(January 05, 2008 04:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks for the video clip. Siskel seemed not to have appreciated or understood the "bird" aspect of the film. I side with Ebert on this.<br />
Thumbs up.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1668463</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1668463</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 03:11:29 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>