<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Slowest movie I have ever seen]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Hit</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>samadabbasi</strong> — <em>10 years ago(December 13, 2015 11:59 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Very slow movie and weak plot.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/198767/slowest-movie-i-have-ever-seen</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 19:11:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/198767.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 04:29:26 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Slowest movie I have ever seen on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 04:29:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>OldManWithDominoes</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 08, 2016 01:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'd agree wholeheartedly. I've just seen this for the first time on television (the rather wonderful in its way London Live). I don't mind slow movies and weak plots if in return you're given good characters and strong acting. An example is a much more recent road movie "Valley of Love" with wonderful performances from Depardieu and Huppert.<br />
This was just nihilistic and largely pointless. "Sexy Beast" is so much better as a Brit gangsters in Spain movie.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1673008</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1673008</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 04:29:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>