<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Joeys wifr]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Woman in Red</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>mtcefc</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 07, 2016 11:27 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I watched this movie a few times growing up for the obvious reasons growing up but I watched it last night as a 35 year old and watched it from a different angle.<br />
It really hits home about how people act and how groups of men cover up for each other's affairs etc.<br />
One question I have though is why does Joeys wife take him back?. It seemed she made a final decision and took the kids and furniture.<br />
I know people take cheaters back all the time and some people can't stand to be alone which I assume was the reason but it just seemed to be a bit of a 'Oh yeah, Joey got back with his wife'</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/199900/joeys-wifr</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 19:34:51 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/199900.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:25:19 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joeys wifr on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:25:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Rajesh 'Raj' 'Rajee' 'Raju' 'Premraj' Mullan</strong> — <em>5 years ago(September 24, 2020 07:32 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">these words from Ted E. seemed to surprise me a little bit, considering what Ted E. was trying to get up to himself, hana<br />
The only unpleasant surprise, was that in two days…<br />
… Joe was back in form.<br />
Yes, Ted E was a big hyppercrite, hana</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1683379</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1683379</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:25:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joeys wifr on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:25:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Novtej_Dil</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 11, 2016 12:52 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Couple of things<br />
First, Joey's wife looked a bit of a dog<br />
Second these words from Ted E. seemed to surprise me a little bit, considering what Ted E. was trying to get up to himself, hana<br />
The only unpleasant surprise, was that in two days<br />
Joe was back in form.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1683378</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1683378</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:25:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joeys wifr on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:25:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mtcefc</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 07, 2016 01:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Wife even</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1683377</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1683377</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:25:20 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>