<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[This episode was great, but I have to admit I was a little disappointed by the vague explanation of what Mike is. Not sa]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Twilight Zone</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>troythetroy-94600</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 27, 2016 11:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This episode was great, but I have to admit I was a little disappointed by the vague explanation of what Mike is. Not saying I wanted a huge explanation, but maybe just a bit more than what we got.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/200300/this-episode-was-great-but-i-have-to-admit-i-was-a-little-disappointed-by-the-vague-explanation-of-what-mike-is-not-sa</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 18:26:51 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/200300.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:16:07 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>