<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Spoilers:  How did the plane…………..   ……………….   ………]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Aviator</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>oldsenior</strong> — <em>20 years ago(March 14, 2006 07:03 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">How did the rescue plane land in that rough snake-like river terrain, then be able to fly out with all three people aboard?  It's surposed to be a true story (I guess they actually had the flat lands of mid-west America in true life and not the Yugoslavian mountainess areas where the film was shot).</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/200390/spoilers-how-did-the-plane</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 15:04:25 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/200390.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:28:25 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Spoilers:  How did the plane…………..   ……………….   ……… on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:28:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>joegerardi-1</strong> — <em>16 years ago(June 30, 2009 04:27 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Without getting too technical about flying, the older planes (supposed to be an Airco DH.4, or maybe a Curtiss JN-4 but in the movie they used Stearman 75s) had a stall speed of about 35 MPH, That means the ship lost lift and stopped flying at that speed. Additionally the planes of the time (the 1920's) were not very heavy: about 2000 pounds fully loaded. Finally, they were taildraggers, meaning they had the third wheel at the back of the plane, not the front.<br />
All of these elements combine to make a ship that will land in just a couple hundred feet, and with those larger tires and being a taildragger the ground can be pretty rough at that. (Concrete/paved runways were years off in the future: all planes then were designed to take off and land on grass strips.) In fact, landing would not be the issue: short-field landing techniques enable me to land my 2500 pound plane in 800 feet; no, the big concern is getting out again after adding the weight of the 2 new occupants.<br />
The ground near the river looked as though it would easily handle the distance needed to get in/get out.<br />
..Joe</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1687084</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1687084</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:28:26 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>