<![CDATA[Quitters Inc sounds like a really terrible business model]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Cat's Eye

Misanthwopical_Bweed — 10 years ago(January 03, 2016 10:13 PM)

aside from the legal quagmire it would create
the kind of surveillance it would take to put on someone 24/7
that's a lot of man hours
how much do they charge to make that cost effective?
"Abortion is green!"
Doug Stanhope

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/200430/quitters-inc-sounds-like-a-really-terrible-business-modelRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 22:53:04 GMTThu, 30 Apr 2026 08:36:05 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Quitters Inc sounds like a really terrible business model on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:36:07 GMT]]>preachcaleb — 3 years ago(August 08, 2022 01:46 PM)

I just figure it's some subsidiary of a much larger multi-billion dollar business that can afford it.
So many stories, so little time.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1687541https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1687541Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:36:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Quitters Inc sounds like a really terrible business model on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:36:06 GMT]]>SlickySlixta — 9 years ago(January 01, 2017 11:13 AM)

You know I actually thought the same thing. I know it's only a movie and fictional and all that, but my rational mind has a real hard time grasping the concept of Quitters Inc. I still love it though, it was the funniest segment in the movie.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1687540https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1687540Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:36:06 GMT