<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The mother in the 3rd act wasn&#x27;t evil.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Cat's Eye</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>draftdubya</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 11, 2017 09:18 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">She had every right to be cautious. A stray cat around a bird that was not familiar with, disease cats carry, she assumed the cat killed the pet bird, she seen the cat actually kill a bird. The things I see wrong is that she could've put the cat in the cellar instead of placing it outside where it will kill any small animal in the area. Who the heck would buy a loud arse bird like that for a kid's room.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/200432/the-mother-in-the-3rd-act-wasn-t-evil</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 22:53:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/200432.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:36:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The mother in the 3rd act wasn&#x27;t evil. on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:36:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>preachcaleb</strong> — <em>3 years ago(August 08, 2022 01:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah, she's right to be cautious. But it's weird to bring up the whole cats steal children's breath story. That's just nonsense.<br />
So many stories, so little time.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1687546</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1687546</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:36:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>