<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[filmed in 2.35:1 aspect ratio but yet displayed 4:3 pan&#x2F;scan on cinemax HD ?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Cat's Eye</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>EliteData</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 16, 2016 12:22 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">filmed in 2.35:1 aspect ratio but yet displayed 4:3 pan/scan on cinemax HD ?<br />
what's the deal with that and why ?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/200451/filmed-in-2-35-1-aspect-ratio-but-yet-displayed-4-3-pan-scan-on-cinemax-hd</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 19:34:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/200451.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:39:36 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to filmed in 2.35:1 aspect ratio but yet displayed 4:3 pan&#x2F;scan on cinemax HD ? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:39:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Banky-4</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 25, 2016 08:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'm watching it now and it's annoying me too.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1687750</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1687750</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:39:37 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>