Some good points made. I just feel they could have done better.
Another Dead movie was well anticipated by horror fans, especially of the first two, but overall it failed to ignite. By the time it came out, it had lost its lustre.
I had to wait 4yrs before it was released on vhs where I was living at the time. I had already seen a doco on its make-up effects. The novelty had worn off by then.
Norman! What did you put in my tea?

It's an interesting departure from the other two.
What the three do have is a zombie attack in different settings, locations and scenarios.
Do they all happen during the same apocalypse or different ones?
There is no thread linking them with hero characters as there is with modern living dead franchise movies that are more about the action.
(Resident Evil comes first to mind.)
I had a hard time grasping the idea of how the military and science experiments on zombies is even being allowed together in the same space.
I was more on the side of the soldier leader and it turns out he was right.
While there is a lot of dialog and being stuck in an underground bunker with some control over the zombies is not as exciting as being in a shopping mall, I give some credit for trying an experiment or a different way to make another Dead movie.
They wanted to try a new setting and I guess this was the best they came up with?
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall

Norman! What did you put in my tea?

It did give us one of the most bad ass final moments in movies.
As he is being ripped apart his final words are, "Choke on it!"
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall