<![CDATA[6.7??!?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Fletch

Al_Shoehorn_Bundy — 13 years ago(May 25, 2012 11:39 PM)

That's it? Not even a 7? Pathetic.
What is wrong with you people? You're all a bunch of Mr. Underhill's.
"Having sex with a pregnant woman is like putting gas in a car you just wrecked." - Jefferson

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/200785/6-7RSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 15:18:28 GMTThu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:50 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7??!? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:58 GMT]]>romanticinsomniac — 10 years ago(February 17, 2016 05:42 PM)

I gave it a 10. I love it.
100% Comic Book Purist, and Bloody Proud of it !

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690657https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690657Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7??!? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:57 GMT]]>RickVee — 10 years ago(February 01, 2016 07:46 AM)

Up to a 6.9 now but that's still much too low in my book. Should be at a 7.5 at least. Seriously funny movie.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690656https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690656Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7??!? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:56 GMT]]>miles-bennett-dyson — 10 years ago(April 15, 2015 09:09 PM)

In gave it a 9, I still rewatch it pretty often.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690655https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690655Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7??!? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:55 GMT]]>Elephantlips — 11 years ago(March 18, 2015 10:15 AM)

Agreed.
Bunch of stinkos in here!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690654https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690654Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7??!? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:54 GMT]]>FridayOnElmStreet — 11 years ago(May 19, 2014 05:28 AM)

Its a 10 for me.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690653https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690653Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7??!? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:54 GMT]]>Shiddy — 11 years ago(April 14, 2014 03:00 AM)

I gave it an 8, it's hilarious, but yet it has a serious, coherent plot that unfolds at a decent pace, and it has replay value, which is what most of today's "movies" are lacking.. (and it had that unforgettable Faltermeyer 80s music)

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690652https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690652Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7??!? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:53 GMT]]>jadbama — 12 years ago(March 11, 2014 08:36 PM)

Totally agree. One of the top 2 or 3 comedy's of the 80's.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690651https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690651Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7??!? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:52 GMT]]>LightningLad — 13 years ago(August 12, 2012 10:28 AM)

I definitely think it's at least a 7.5, I gave it a 9 to try to bring it up a bit.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Mortal-Creeps-ebook/dp/B006LO3TCA

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690650https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690650Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7??!? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:51 GMT]]>jamieleefan1 — 13 years ago(July 30, 2012 01:38 PM)

I can just hear all the Mr. Underhill's out there now, "I suppose you're expecting a high rating. Maybe next time."

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690649https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690649Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:51 GMT