<![CDATA[That's it? Not even a 7? Pathetic.]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Fletch

Al_Shoehorn_Bundy — 13 years ago(May 25, 2012 11:39 PM)

That's it? Not even a 7? Pathetic.
What is wrong with you people? You're all a bunch of Mr. Underhill's.
"Having sex with a pregnant woman is like putting gas in a car you just wrecked." - Jefferson

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/200786/that-s-it-not-even-a-7-patheticRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 01:03:51 GMTThu, 30 Apr 2026 09:29:59 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to That's it? Not even a 7? Pathetic. on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:09 GMT]]>romanticinsomniac — 10 years ago(February 17, 2016 05:42 PM)

I gave it a 10. I love it.
100% Comic Book Purist, and Bloody Proud of it !

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690667https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690667Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to That's it? Not even a 7? Pathetic. on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:08 GMT]]>RickVee — 10 years ago(February 01, 2016 07:46 AM)

Up to a 6.9 now but that's still much too low in my book. Should be at a 7.5 at least. Seriously funny movie.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690666https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690666Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to That's it? Not even a 7? Pathetic. on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:07 GMT]]>miles-bennett-dyson — 10 years ago(April 15, 2015 09:09 PM)

In gave it a 9, I still rewatch it pretty often.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690665https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690665Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to That's it? Not even a 7? Pathetic. on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:06 GMT]]>Elephantlips — 11 years ago(March 18, 2015 10:15 AM)

Agreed.
Bunch of stinkos in here!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690664https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690664Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to That's it? Not even a 7? Pathetic. on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:05 GMT]]>FridayOnElmStreet — 11 years ago(May 19, 2014 05:28 AM)

Its a 10 for me.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690663https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690663Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to That's it? Not even a 7? Pathetic. on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:04 GMT]]>Shiddy — 11 years ago(April 14, 2014 03:00 AM)

I gave it an 8, it's hilarious, but yet it has a serious, coherent plot that unfolds at a decent pace, and it has replay value, which is what most of today's "movies" are lacking.. (and it had that unforgettable Faltermeyer 80s music)

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690662https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690662Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to That's it? Not even a 7? Pathetic. on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:03 GMT]]>jadbama — 12 years ago(March 11, 2014 08:36 PM)

Totally agree. One of the top 2 or 3 comedy's of the 80's.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690661https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690661Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to That's it? Not even a 7? Pathetic. on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:02 GMT]]>LightningLad — 13 years ago(August 12, 2012 10:28 AM)

I definitely think it's at least a 7.5, I gave it a 9 to try to bring it up a bit.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Mortal-Creeps-ebook/dp/B006LO3TCA

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690660https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690660Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to That's it? Not even a 7? Pathetic. on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:00 GMT]]>jamieleefan1 — 13 years ago(July 30, 2012 01:38 PM)

I can just hear all the Mr. Underhill's out there now, "I suppose you're expecting a high rating. Maybe next time."

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690659https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1690659Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:30:00 GMT