<![CDATA[Alternate timeline ending - implications]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Flight of the Navigator

Justincblount — 12 years ago(February 26, 2014 02:06 AM)

At the end, David is returned to a point in time right after his original abduction. However, this is the 3-day-older David that has been through the alternate timeline.
The original David and Max are on a ship heading to Phalon.
8 years later, Max will calculate that it's too risky to send David back to 1978. He then will dump him in 1986. David in this timeline will find his older self and family. If he stays in 1986, it would mean he was never sent back to his original timeline in the first place. That kind of contradiction would force the timeline right back to when he was missing, making all of these events continue unresolved on an infinite loop.
So the original David still needs to find Max at NASA in this new timeline so he can get sent back. It will take at least one more cycle(likely more) to bridge the timelines so that both Davids have the same experiences, synchronizing the timeline. Otherwise there can be no future beyond the looping events.
TLDR: time travel is complex.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/202134/alternate-timeline-ending-implicationsRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 15:14:58 GMTThu, 30 Apr 2026 12:47:40 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Alternate timeline ending - implications on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:47:43 GMT]]>old-skool101 — 9 years ago(July 09, 2016 01:23 PM)

Yep,
Imagine trying to sell that to the execs at Disney.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1702330https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1702330Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:47:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Alternate timeline ending - implications on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:47:42 GMT]]>Alfabeta — 11 years ago(March 22, 2015 01:28 PM)

One of many ideas that would make this paper thin plot much more interesting, had they been dwelt on.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1702329https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1702329Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:47:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Alternate timeline ending - implications on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:47:41 GMT]]>sun_scryer — 11 years ago(October 19, 2014 10:48 AM)

Infinite worlds, infinite timelines. You're absolutely right about what really happened at the end. But it's possible other choices were made by other David and Maxes. It would be like Sarah Connor Chronicles, where Derek Reese's girlfriend remembers things that never happened for Derek Reese, but her timeline is as valid as his.
There is no synchronizing timelines, there's only getting 'close enough' (like Homer Simpson in the lizard tongue world).
(In reply to hwcperfect re Godzilla 2014)
LaLlama: Make me give a beep whats going on

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1702328https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1702328Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:47:41 GMT