No, it’s good.
I was watching the other day on my big screen was shocked how good it and futuristic it looked and was surprised how this classic masterpiece didnt do that good at the box.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

Yes, Lambert was, er odd casting from a number of perspectives, not least him supposed to be a Highland Scot…like wtf.
The Kurgan was great and Connery at his most charming.

Spot on! The Kurgan is quite possibly the greatest cinematic villain ever.

The main "hero" is very bad actor, one of the worst I have seen in a major feature film. Kurgan is so good he saved the entire movie and completely overshadowed Sean Connery, who was also excellent in his role.
The Lion does not give a fuck. Bring. More. Sheep.

Just rewatching with my boys. The cinematography is good; Scotland looks gorgeous.
The story is still good, it draws you in.
The special effects and some of the acting, well, that holds up not as well, not at all.
Still, an enjoyable film.

You are absolutely correct. It's a very good looking movie.
So many stories, so little time.

I heartily agree!
Hey, it's a kind of magic!

Yeah, it's probably the most competent part of the movie.
www.ipetitions.com/petition/petition-to-keep-the-imdb-messageboards-going