<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Better than 1]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Beverly Hills Cop II</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>M_Exchange</strong> — <em>10 years ago(April 06, 2015 03:38 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Eddie makes me laugh a lot more in this one. He seems to be more relaxed, and his deliberately exaggerated acting cracks me up much more than in 1.<br />
I especially love that "HE'S NOT LETTING ME SEARCH HIM?! WHY WOULD  HE NOT LET ME SEARCH HIM UNLESS HE'S A COP?!" bit near the beginning with that "this is pure b.s." face and voice.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/203826/better-than-1</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 13:12:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/203826.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:08 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Better than 1 on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>McQueen1980</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 06, 2016 12:51 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">judge reinhold is a weak presence in these movies albeit vaguely likeable</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718978</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718978</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Better than 1 on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ShallowAl69</strong> — <em>10 years ago(April 02, 2016 10:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In my opinion the villains of part 2, Jurgen Prochnow and Brigitte Nielsen, are far superior to the bad guy from part one.<br />
That having been typed Judge Reinhold was much more fresh faced, and hot, in part 1.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718977</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718977</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Better than 1 on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>PhilistinePictures</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 30, 2016 04:21 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I prefer the second film on the whole but think Murphy's performance in the first one was better.<br />
Foley was always charmingly cocky, but in the second film, there's a touch of vanity as well.<br />
I suspect this was more to do with Murphy being a bigger star by 1987 than it has to do with the character developing in the series' timeline.<br />
The Job Interview Poem</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718976</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718976</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Better than 1 on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>McQueen1980</strong> — <em>10 years ago(May 16, 2015 09:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">yeah he lets go more here and is more fun to watch</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718975</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718975</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:09 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>