<![CDATA[Eddie makes me laugh a lot more in this one. He seems to be more relaxed, and his deliberately exaggerated acting cracks]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Beverly Hills Cop II

M_Exchange — 10 years ago(April 06, 2015 03:38 AM)

Eddie makes me laugh a lot more in this one. He seems to be more relaxed, and his deliberately exaggerated acting cracks me up much more than in 1.
I especially love that "HE'S NOT LETTING ME SEARCH HIM?! WHY WOULD HE NOT LET ME SEARCH HIM UNLESS HE'S A COP?!" bit near the beginning with that "this is pure b.s." face and voice.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/203827/eddie-makes-me-laugh-a-lot-more-in-this-one-he-seems-to-be-more-relaxed-and-his-deliberately-exaggerated-acting-cracksRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 17:54:22 GMTThu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:13 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Eddie makes me laugh a lot more in this one. He seems to be more relaxed, and his deliberately exaggerated acting cracks on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:17 GMT]]>McQueen1980 — 9 years ago(August 06, 2016 12:51 PM)

judge reinhold is a weak presence in these movies albeit vaguely likeable

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718983https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718983Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Eddie makes me laugh a lot more in this one. He seems to be more relaxed, and his deliberately exaggerated acting cracks on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:16 GMT]]>ShallowAl69 — 10 years ago(April 02, 2016 10:02 AM)

In my opinion the villains of part 2, Jurgen Prochnow and Brigitte Nielsen, are far superior to the bad guy from part one.
That having been typed Judge Reinhold was much more fresh faced, and hot, in part 1.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718982https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718982Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Eddie makes me laugh a lot more in this one. He seems to be more relaxed, and his deliberately exaggerated acting cracks on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:15 GMT]]>PhilistinePictures — 10 years ago(March 30, 2016 04:21 PM)

I prefer the second film on the whole but think Murphy's performance in the first one was better.
Foley was always charmingly cocky, but in the second film, there's a touch of vanity as well.
I suspect this was more to do with Murphy being a bigger star by 1987 than it has to do with the character developing in the series' timeline.
The Job Interview Poem

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718981https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718981Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Eddie makes me laugh a lot more in this one. He seems to be more relaxed, and his deliberately exaggerated acting cracks on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:14 GMT]]>McQueen1980 — 10 years ago(May 16, 2015 09:47 AM)

yeah he lets go more here and is more fun to watch

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718980https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1718980Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:47:14 GMT