<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I think so. It&#x27;s still entertaining once you get past the annoying flashbacks.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>joshwinkler87</strong> — <em>10 years ago(December 19, 2015 01:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think so. It's still entertaining once you get past the annoying flashbacks.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/204790/i-think-so-it-s-still-entertaining-once-you-get-past-the-annoying-flashbacks</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 21:16:46 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/204790.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:59:28 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. It&#x27;s still entertaining once you get past the annoying flashbacks. on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:59:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ElectricWarlock</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 19, 2016 08:17 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I wouldn't exactly call it pointless. It's interesting to see how Ricky would've been effected by the experience. Even though he was only a baby when it happened he'd still feel the effects of not having a normal childhood living in the orphanage. And he'd have to watch his brother's downward spiral all those years. It would've taken a serious toll on anyone. So to me, it makes sense that he'd go a bit crazy as well.<br />
But I do agree it uses a bit too much footage from the first movie. It could've trimmed a lot of it out and still gotten the point across just fine. It would've been a lot shorter but less is more in this case. Still a good movie, though. I hated it the first time I watched it but it gets a little better with each viewing.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726382</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726382</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:59:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think so. It&#x27;s still entertaining once you get past the annoying flashbacks. on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:59:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>wallacesawyer</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 17, 2016 12:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In the sense it was originally supposed to be a special extended edition of the original, maybe. But as for films with too much recycled footage, SLEEPAWAY CAMP IV: THE SURVIVOR takes the cake for most pointless, mainly because they had little to nothing new to work with. But they went a head anyway.<br />
<a href="http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726381</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726381</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:59:29 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>