<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[OK. but not one of Ridley&#x27;s best]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Someone to Watch Over Me</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>lucky8213</strong> — <em>21 years ago(January 27, 2005 07:56 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It was an average movie. OK but kind of dissapointing considering the talent of the director. I even liked Legend so I consider this his first low point for him. Thenagain Ridley Scott has had kind of an uneven career, although some great films. Anyone agrees?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/204865/ok-but-not-one-of-ridley-s-best</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 16:37:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/204865.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:26 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OK. but not one of Ridley&#x27;s best on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>barry70</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 06, 2015 07:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I felt it was predictable (in that he'd choose his wife/long-term partner over the blonde witness) and at times, had the air of a Hallmark/Lifetime TV chick flick movie.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726827</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726827</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OK. but not one of Ridley&#x27;s best on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Prismark10</strong> — <em>11 years ago(February 22, 2015 12:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It looks more like a Tony Scott film.<br />
Its that man again!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726826</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726826</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OK. but not one of Ridley&#x27;s best on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>gioconda91423</strong> — <em>11 years ago(January 06, 2015 07:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This movie was a huge disappointment when it was released, and has aged very badly. The weakness in Ridley Scott's less-than-successfull movies like this one is casting. For instance, the "bad guy" in this movie was terrible. He took me completely out of the movie. Several of the other small roles of cops were played by actors who were either poorly directed or not very good. At some points it feels like a high school play. Then the big screen charisma of Lorraine Bracco, Mimi Robinson &amp; Tom Berenger kicks in, and you feel like you are watching a big Hollywood movie again.<br />
Very uneven movie, but not unwatchable.<br />
P. S.<br />
Why do I dislike posts that end with "anyone agree?" Who cares. If you are going to post on the internet, what do you want? A a pat on the head? I don't care if anyone in cyberspace agrees with me or not. It's not going to put a dime in my bank account or make it easier for me to sleep at night. Sayonara.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726825</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726825</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OK. but not one of Ridley&#x27;s best on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>peterduray-bito</strong> — <em>12 years ago(August 23, 2013 10:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Not one of his best but a solid 7 not a 6.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726824</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726824</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OK. but not one of Ridley&#x27;s best on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mikekaraoke23</strong> — <em>15 years ago(August 14, 2010 06:42 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">yea i really liked this movie.Like lucky said she thought it was average so she didnt dislike it i thought it was better than average</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726823</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726823</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OK. but not one of Ridley&#x27;s best on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>JoeLoebner</strong> — <em>17 years ago(January 02, 2009 02:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah, it's really cool.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726822</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726822</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OK. but not one of Ridley&#x27;s best on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>joonas1038</strong> — <em>17 years ago(June 04, 2008 03:09 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">i think it was ridleys best &lt; .</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726821</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726821</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OK. but not one of Ridley&#x27;s best on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726820</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726820</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OK. but not one of Ridley&#x27;s best on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TheInterpreterWIDESHUT</strong> — <em>20 years ago(October 17, 2005 08:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I totally disagree, this wasn't a fantasy, it was a slasher movie <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /><br />
and I would say it is some of his best along with "Black Rain" and "Blade Runner"<br />
In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726819</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726819</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OK. but not one of Ridley&#x27;s best on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>p51mustang67</strong> — <em>20 years ago(April 09, 2005 11:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I actually liked it. It was different than most of his other films, and the acting in it was great. The story was very convincing and showed what else Scott could do.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726818</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1726818</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:07:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>