<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why did they pick that over sized thing to play buds love interest?? Her face is about 2 feet long, she&#x27;s like 6 foot 7]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Wall Street</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>nutmustardxx</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 02, 2016 02:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Why did they pick that over sized thing to play buds love interest?? Her face is about 2 feet long, she's like 6 foot 7 tall, she talks w that annoying lispof all the hotties they could have.chosen for the role and they pick that obnoxious and boring actress.<br />
She almost ruined the movie but took it down to a 8 from a 9.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/205227/why-did-they-pick-that-over-sized-thing-to-play-buds-love-interest-her-face-is-about-2-feet-long-she-s-like-6-foot-7</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 17:57:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/205227.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:43 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why did they pick that over sized thing to play buds love interest?? Her face is about 2 feet long, she&#x27;s like 6 foot 7 on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>NutMustardx</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 10, 2017 06:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Her asss is about 3 feet and flat as a board, can't imagine how bad it looks these days</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729653</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729653</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why did they pick that over sized thing to play buds love interest?? Her face is about 2 feet long, she&#x27;s like 6 foot 7 on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>wylierichardson-966-922691</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 08, 2017 04:15 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Actually, she is 5'10 tall.  And the 'face that is 2 feet long' remark is odd.  Anyone with that feature would be considered to be DEFORMED!  Considering her long career, and that no less than JFK Jr. has dated her, she can't be all that off-putting.  With that said, she wasn't especially happy with her role in this - she actually refused to watch the finished product.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729652</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729652</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why did they pick that over sized thing to play buds love interest?? Her face is about 2 feet long, she&#x27;s like 6 foot 7 on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ABBAcat</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 23, 2017 02:57 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Lol, the standards of beauty were different in the '80s and favored the tall, athletic, blond. Splash was to Daryl, what Pretty Woman was to Julia Roberts.  I don't think either actress is beautiful by today's standards.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729651</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729651</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why did they pick that over sized thing to play buds love interest?? Her face is about 2 feet long, she&#x27;s like 6 foot 7 on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SaliceMcD</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 19, 2017 04:14 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Not being able to play a snobby socialite certainly doesn't say much for her abilities as an actress, as she comes from a wealthy background.  But I wouldn't say she's ugly.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729650</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729650</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why did they pick that over sized thing to play buds love interest?? Her face is about 2 feet long, she&#x27;s like 6 foot 7 on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Paul_Ke</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 21, 2016 09:55 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Everyone told him to replace her because she was miscast, not because she was ugly.  She was miscast because she was terrible at playing a snobby socialite who only cared about money.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729649</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729649</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why did they pick that over sized thing to play buds love interest?? Her face is about 2 feet long, she&#x27;s like 6 foot 7 on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>krisdb</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 21, 2016 09:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">She looks like a transvestite to me.  In the trivia section it says that Stone was too proud to replace her, even when everyone told him to.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729648</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729648</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why did they pick that over sized thing to play buds love interest?? Her face is about 2 feet long, she&#x27;s like 6 foot 7 on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Paul_Ke</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 14, 2016 07:57 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You're crazy.  Hannah is very good looking.  (And I'm saying this as someone who prefers brunettes, like Sean Young, who is also pretty.)</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729647</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729647</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why did they pick that over sized thing to play buds love interest?? Her face is about 2 feet long, she&#x27;s like 6 foot 7 on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ToastedCheese</strong> — <em>3 years ago(April 14, 2022 09:00 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Even writer-director Oliver Stone thought the blonde beauty was miscast in Wall Street – and he cast her! Costar Sean Young repeatedly pleaded with Stone to let them switch roles. But Stone was so annoyed with Young that he refused even though he grudgingly admitted that Young was better-suited to Hannah’s role.<br />
I find her bearable, but this is not the first time Stone has made some dodgy casting calls, see his sequel, and Stone should have swallowed his pride and conceded to Young. She was right, she was more ideal for role of Darien. That is why she acted like a bitch to everyone on the set.<br />
Hannah was a nothing entity really and apparently she didn't even like the character herself, nor her own performance.<br />
Stone wanted James Woods for Gekko originally but he apparently turned it down to do<br />
Cop<br />
. Tom Cruise also wanted the role of Fox, but Sheen had already been cast and it would have likely been a reward for the success of<br />
Platoon<br />
.<br />
I don't have an issue with Douglas or Sheen, but I can see Woods and Cruise working out well in an alternate universe. Plus it was a nice touch that Charlie and Martin played on-screen father and son too.<br />
Norman! What did you put in my tea?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729646</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729646</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why did they pick that over sized thing to play buds love interest?? Her face is about 2 feet long, she&#x27;s like 6 foot 7 on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>NutMustardx</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 29, 2016 05:55 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Sean young would have been way way bettershe's actually hott.  Bud did have a hottie in his bed at one point her asss was so much better than Darrel Hannahs wide flat asss</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729645</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729645</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why did they pick that over sized thing to play buds love interest?? Her face is about 2 feet long, she&#x27;s like 6 foot 7 on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TMC-4</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 20, 2016 01:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.imdb.com/board/20000435/board/thread/260034065" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/board/20000435/board/thread/260034065</a><br />
Her acting is beyond terrible. Her presence in a film can make it unwatchable. I physically cringe every time she delivers a line. In every role I've seen her in, I never once, for a single moment, found it to be a genuine moment.<br />
<a href="https://lebeauleblog.com/2015/11/19/golden-raspberry-awards-1987/5/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://lebeauleblog.com/2015/11/19/golden-raspberry-awards-1987/5/</a><br />
Worst Supporting Actress<br />
Daryl Hannah<br />
in Wall Street as Darien Taylor<br />
Gloria Foster in Leonard Part 6 as Medusa Johnson<br />
Mariel Hemingway in Superman IV: The Quest for Peace as Lacy Warfield<br />
Grace Jones in Siesta as Conchita<br />
Isabella Rossellini in Siesta and Tough Guys Dont Dance as Marie and Madeleine Regency (respectively)<br />
Winner:<br />
Daryl Hannah<br />
Im not going to quibble too much with the nominees here.  Its a bit weird to me to see two nominees from Siesta.  Siesta was a little arthouse movie starring Ellen Barkin, Gabriel Byrne and Julian Sands.  It was directed by Mary Lambert who got her start directing music videos for Madonna and would later go on to make the Pet Sematary movies.  Rossellini and Jones arent really in the movie all that much.  Of course, Rossellinis nomination is mostly for Tough Guys Dont Dance and Jones is probably belated nomination for Conan the Destroyer and A View to a Kill.<br />
I have always liked Mariel Hemingway, but Superman IV is awful.  I dont understand how Jon Cryer wasnt nominated in the next category.<br />
Daryl Hannah took home the prize and its hard to disagree.  Even writer-director Oliver Stone thought the blonde beauty was miscast in Wall Street  and he cast her!  Costar Sean Young repeatedly pleaded with Stone to let them switch roles.  But Stone was so annoyed with Young that he refused even though he grudgingly admitted that Young was better-suited to Hannahs role.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729644</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1729644</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:57:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>