<![CDATA[Why so short?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Dead Pool

garrettok31 — 15 years ago(March 30, 2011 10:51 PM)

Why does this Dirty Harry movie barely hit the 90 minute mark and was shot flat, while all the others were filmed anamorphic and clock in about 2 hours? (Ok the Enforcerwas 95 min, I wonder about that too)
Was it laziness? cash issues?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/205912/why-so-shortRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 13:05:45 GMTThu, 30 Apr 2026 22:27:23 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Why so short? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:27:25 GMT]]>pawtrax67 — 11 years ago(June 07, 2014 10:45 PM)

It seems they wanted to make a Dirty Harry movie, but didn't want to put any money into the budget. Or the script.
It's too bad because I think there was a very good movie that could have been made. (At least a movie to end the series with a bang!) I know Warner Bros. wasn't doing great in the 80's, so maybe they were just out to make a quick buck.
At least it's not as bad as The Enforcer.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1734616https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1734616Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:27:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why so short? on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:27:24 GMT]]>Prismark10 — 13 years ago(December 25, 2012 06:25 AM)

Ran out of script and bullets!
Its that man again!!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1734615https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1734615Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:27:24 GMT