<![CDATA[Why does this Dirty Harry movie barely hit the 90 minute mark and was shot flat, while all the others were filmed anamor]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Dead Pool

garrettok31 — 15 years ago(March 30, 2011 10:51 PM)

Why does this Dirty Harry movie barely hit the 90 minute mark and was shot flat, while all the others were filmed anamorphic and clock in about 2 hours? (Ok the Enforcerwas 95 min, I wonder about that too)
Was it laziness? cash issues?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/205913/why-does-this-dirty-harry-movie-barely-hit-the-90-minute-mark-and-was-shot-flat-while-all-the-others-were-filmed-anamorRSS for NodeSun, 17 May 2026 18:47:11 GMTThu, 30 Apr 2026 22:27:27 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Why does this Dirty Harry movie barely hit the 90 minute mark and was shot flat, while all the others were filmed anamor on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:27:29 GMT]]>pawtrax67 — 11 years ago(June 07, 2014 10:45 PM)

It seems they wanted to make a Dirty Harry movie, but didn't want to put any money into the budget. Or the script.
It's too bad because I think there was a very good movie that could have been made. (At least a movie to end the series with a bang!) I know Warner Bros. wasn't doing great in the 80's, so maybe they were just out to make a quick buck.
At least it's not as bad as The Enforcer.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1734619https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1734619Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:27:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why does this Dirty Harry movie barely hit the 90 minute mark and was shot flat, while all the others were filmed anamor on Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:27:28 GMT]]>Prismark10 — 13 years ago(December 25, 2012 06:25 AM)

Ran out of script and bullets!
Its that man again!!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1734618https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1734618Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:27:28 GMT