<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[More montages!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — She's Having a Baby</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>kipconlon-1</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 21, 2016 07:09 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I saw this again for the first time in a while. There are moments I enjoy, but it became unignorably clear they had about 35 minutes of a story/movie, and just decided to pad it out with one montage after another. That's not really a movie, nor is this really a movie.  The kooky, freewheeling, celebrity studded end credits feel like an apology on the filmmakers' part for knowingly wasting your time. That said, i laughed aloud a few times, and the leads were quite good. Gone are the days when you can gain any sympathy for falling ass backwards into a lucrative career. If you really could then. And food for thought, was Alec Badlwin in love with Kevin Bacon?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/206567/more-montages</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 11:37:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/206567.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 23:57:03 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>