<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Not bad but not great. Overall it kept my attention]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — After Midnight</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>johnbayer79</strong> — <em>12 years ago(May 21, 2013 09:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Not bad but not great. Overall it kept my attention</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/207326/not-bad-but-not-great-overall-it-kept-my-attention</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 06:02:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/207326.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 01:29:01 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Not bad but not great. Overall it kept my attention on Fri, 01 May 2026 01:29:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Woodyanders</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 24, 2015 11:48 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I thought this film was quite enjoyable. I liked the last segment the most.<br />
I am the Duke of IMDb bio writers! I am A#1!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1744270</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1744270</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 01:29:03 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>