I guess it depends on how you approach it. If you're looking for a Batman movie, it's BATMAN '89, and it isn't even close. BATMAN RETURNS is a great Tim Burton movie but a really, really bad Batman movie–the one that set that run of pictures on the road to ruin, with devolution to Adam West rubbish. For all its shortcomings (and there are several glaring ones), BATMAN '89 was the definitive live-action screen Batman for decades. Maybe it still is–it was 2022 and the Matt Reeves' THE BATMAN before it even had any serious competition for that title.
"The Dig"
http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/

Batman 89. I've only saw part 2 once in the theater with friends.
Tell you what…When I send my ex-wife her money…you can lick the stamps.

It was all Image.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

Returns is better, ‘89 one is ****ing boring! And Batman can’t even move his neck.
Melton1 Wanted for Pedophilia:
https://i.ibb.co/6cnPmJVr/IMG-0830.jpg
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/Zjxk307CND0

Returns,
It’s much more romantic.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

This message has been deleted.

Batman Returns
“There are no atheists in foxholes, eh?”-Keith Jennings from the Omen.

Batman Returns

Returns.
My password is password