<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[its dark , has a surreal sense of humour , most of the effects look real and batman is more brooding in this]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Batman</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>dragonstephen-1</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 18, 2017 06:23 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">its dark , has a surreal sense of humour , most of the effects look real and batman is more brooding in this<br />
I would say its equal to the awesome Dark Knight trilogy</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/207534/its-dark-has-a-surreal-sense-of-humour-most-of-the-effects-look-real-and-batman-is-more-brooding-in-this</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:11:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/207534.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to its dark , has a surreal sense of humour , most of the effects look real and batman is more brooding in this on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>justanicknamed</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 25, 2017 05:44 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Burton paved the way for comic book movies after Superman 1 &amp; 2, but Nolan's movies mostly sucked.<br />
Plus, Marvel is kicking azz left and right.  They've shown that comic book movies can be both entertaining and serious without being somber.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746362</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746362</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to its dark , has a surreal sense of humour , most of the effects look real and batman is more brooding in this on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ZakkWyldeMyLittlePony</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 24, 2017 05:53 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Burton and Nolan's respective versions of Batman are both better than any modern day comic book movie.<br />
Tony Iommi of Black Sabbath is a Brony</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746361</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746361</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to its dark , has a surreal sense of humour , most of the effects look real and batman is more brooding in this on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>justanicknamed</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 25, 2017 06:12 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Miniature is not CGI.<br />
I didn't say it was.  I said that there were scenes in the movie which were obviously miniature sets.  That isn't any different than obvious CGI.<br />
Same with Joker falling.  It was obviously a cartoon.  How is that better than CGI.<br />
In the end, if they had good CGI back then, they would have used it.<br />
Still love the movie no matter what.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746360</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746360</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to its dark , has a surreal sense of humour , most of the effects look real and batman is more brooding in this on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>cinephyler</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 25, 2017 06:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Miniature is not CGI.<br />
Joker falling (and the initial shot from above of Batman and his shadow) look like poor effects, but not necessarily CGI.  There are many film/effects techniques (good or bad) that don't really on computer generation of imagery.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746359</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746359</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to its dark , has a surreal sense of humour , most of the effects look real and batman is more brooding in this on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>justanicknamed</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 23, 2017 09:17 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I love this movie, but I don't think the CGI point is valid.  There were scenes in which you could tell things were miniature and Joker falling looked cartoonish.<br />
Still one of my all-time favorite movies, but CGI would have helped with a few things here and there.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746358</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746358</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to its dark , has a surreal sense of humour , most of the effects look real and batman is more brooding in this on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bass-player-blues</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 23, 2017 02:36 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's the godfather of all comic book movies today and more unique.  They put a lot more effort into the script and art direction.  No CGI in 1989.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746357</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746357</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to its dark , has a surreal sense of humour , most of the effects look real and batman is more brooding in this on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Hendry_William_French</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 19, 2017 08:11 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Batman is better than all comic book movies today<br />
Fixed.<br />
My name is Hendry William French</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746356</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746356</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to its dark , has a surreal sense of humour , most of the effects look real and batman is more brooding in this on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>oldchummer</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 18, 2017 08:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Most comic book movies today are a 6/10-6.5/10 for me, which is about the same I'd give this one.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746355</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746355</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to its dark , has a surreal sense of humour , most of the effects look real and batman is more brooding in this on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>justanicknamed</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 18, 2017 07:45 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The Dull Knight trilogy is incredibly over-rated.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746354</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1746354</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:06:07 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>