<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[So why was Col. Shaw absolutely required to follow Col. Montgomery if…]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Glory</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>kris_michael</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 17, 2017 02:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Are they both Colonels? How did Montgomery outrank Shaw and make him torch the village? I guess I don't understand the hierarchy of the military.<br />
"Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/207780/so-why-was-col-shaw-absolutely-required-to-follow-col-montgomery-if</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 16:31:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/207780.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:39:30 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to So why was Col. Shaw absolutely required to follow Col. Montgomery if… on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:39:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Thomas-FordJr-1</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 26, 2017 02:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's like two captains, on two different ships. Once one captain boards the other captain's ship, the host captain is the commanding officer.<br />
In this case, the "ship" is Montgomery's operation, and Shaw and his outfit were guests on the "ship". So Shaw followed him.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748241</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748241</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:39:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to So why was Col. Shaw absolutely required to follow Col. Montgomery if… on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:39:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Doc80</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 20, 2017 05:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah you don't typically have two officers of the same rank within a relatively small command structure like that. Typically a brigade commander would be a brigadier general (one star) but with the loss of so many officers during the war officers would get promoted or given commands that they really weren't qualified for.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748240</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748240</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:39:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to So why was Col. Shaw absolutely required to follow Col. Montgomery if… on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:39:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kris_michael</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 19, 2017 06:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ah, ok. I see now. Thank you for the information.<br />
"Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748239</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748239</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:39:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to So why was Col. Shaw absolutely required to follow Col. Montgomery if… on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:39:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Doc80</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 19, 2017 06:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Even though the are both colonels, Montgomery was the brigade commander and therefore Shaw's superior in the chain of command.<br />
Think of it like this, lets say Montgomery, Shaw and another officer all have regiments that they are commanders of. The three regiments are grouped together as a brigade. All three men are colonels but someone has to be held accountable for the actions of the brigade, in this case it's Montgomery.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748238</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748238</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:39:31 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>