<![CDATA[Matthew Broderick Was Too Old for this Film!]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Glory

dannieboy20906 — 9 years ago(May 29, 2016 07:41 PM)

I looked him up. Matthew Broderick was born in 1962 and this film was released in 1989. If they spent a year making it, he was 26 years old when they did most of the filming.
Robert Gould Shaw enlisted at the age of 23. If that was as early as April of 1861 when the war started (started by those rebels firing on Federal property at Fort Sumter, mind you), then he was only 25 years old in 1863 when he died (killed by the rebels again) at Fort (or Battery) Wagner.
Matthew Broderick was a year too old to be playing Colonel Shaw!
The best diplomat I know is a fully charged phaser bank.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/207809/matthew-broderick-was-too-old-for-this-filmRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 10:24:12 GMTFri, 01 May 2026 02:45:22 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Matthew Broderick Was Too Old for this Film! on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:31 GMT]]>dannieboy20906 — 9 years ago(September 01, 2016 05:32 PM)

Unfortunately for Mr. Broderick, the real Shaw saw the elephant, while our cinema hero could only pretend. Sometimes the camera can tell the difference.
The best diplomat I know is a fully charged phaser bank.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748569https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748569Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Matthew Broderick Was Too Old for this Film! on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:30 GMT]]>Badlands1 — 9 years ago(September 01, 2016 04:49 PM)

The real shaw I still think looked tougher

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748568https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748568Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Matthew Broderick Was Too Old for this Film! on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:29 GMT]]>dannieboy20906 — 9 years ago(July 30, 2016 07:33 PM)

I recommend that you go online and do a search for images of Robert Gould Shaw. I was, of course, being facetious about Broderick's age because so many people have complained about his youth without doing any research.
The best diplomat I know is a fully charged phaser bank.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748567https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748567Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Matthew Broderick Was Too Old for this Film! on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:28 GMT]]>I_have_a_brain_cloud — 9 years ago(July 30, 2016 01:46 PM)

Yes, and in this movie he looks like he is about 18. plus he has such a great deer-in-the-headlights look.
I'm English, and if there's anything more deplorable than our cooking, it's our lovemaking

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748566https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748566Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Matthew Broderick Was Too Old for this Film! on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:27 GMT]]>Walt-Most — 9 years ago(July 24, 2016 03:27 PM)

I think the OP is responding to the thread about Broderick being to young.

Maybe it's because I've always had a weakness for lost causes, once they're really lost.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748565https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748565Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Matthew Broderick Was Too Old for this Film! on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:26 GMT]]>Blubonnet_Spearman — 9 years ago(July 01, 2016 06:56 AM)

Are you serious or this a joke? If serious, Broderick has a baby face and looks younger to this day then he really is. And secondly, people then lived a much harder life than us so people would look more aged than they were

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748564https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748564Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Matthew Broderick Was Too Old for this Film! on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:25 GMT]]>shawnc101 — 9 years ago(June 15, 2016 10:56 PM)

A year? You really started a thread over an actor being a year older than the character he plays?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748563https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748563Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Matthew Broderick Was Too Old for this Film! on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:24 GMT]]>dannieboy20906 — 9 years ago(June 01, 2016 05:35 AM)

I saw him as guest programmer last night on TCM. He looks about thirty, even though he is in his early fifties. shrug
Enjoy the advantages that your genes allow.
The best diplomat I know is a fully charged phaser bank.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748562https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748562Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Matthew Broderick Was Too Old for this Film! on Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:23 GMT]]>ironskeletor — 9 years ago(June 01, 2016 05:08 AM)

And yet he looks as young as he did in Ferris Bueller's Day Off (ie a convincing teenager).

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748561https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1748561Fri, 01 May 2026 02:45:23 GMT