<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[&quot;The magic is back!&quot;]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Lethal Weapon 2</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>ryderdvs</strong> — <em>11 years ago(June 17, 2014 08:28 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"The magic is back!"<br />
WHAT??<br />
What the hell does that have to do with Riggs and Murtaugh?<br />
Yes, Gibson and Glover had good chemistry in the first film, that's why it worked, and why there were three sequels.<br />
But, "Magic"?? Really strange marketing idea.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/207995/the-magic-is-back</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 19:06:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/207995.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 03:18:11 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &quot;The magic is back!&quot; on Fri, 01 May 2026 03:18:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>The_Eighth_Passenger</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 26, 2016 03:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">What about part 3: The Magic Is Back Again?! So lazy</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1750377</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1750377</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 03:18:12 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>