<![CDATA[Just caught this again on tv after many years and it's still just as good as always, but I noticed something I may have]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Parenthood

jess-mazur31 — 10 years ago(June 03, 2015 03:36 PM)

Just caught this again on tv after many years and it's still just as good as always, but I noticed something I may have missed before. In the beginning there's the scene when Gil puts Kevin to bed and turns to find his son Justin standing there in just a holster belt and cowboy hat. He says something to the effect of "Is that what you're wearing to bed? You'll get cold." I'm sure hoping that the 4-year-old actor was wearing some coverage in the front, but it was certainly convincing and there was no doubt that another cut shot showed his little tushy. ? Lol. I wasnt bothered by the latter, but that front scene took me by surprise for a movie and with a young child. Anyone have thoughts or knowledge I cant find?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/208510/just-caught-this-again-on-tv-after-many-years-and-it-s-still-just-as-good-as-always-but-i-noticed-something-i-may-haveRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 16:11:54 GMTFri, 01 May 2026 04:34:58 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Just caught this again on tv after many years and it's still just as good as always, but I noticed something I may have on Fri, 01 May 2026 04:35:06 GMT]]>myndchanger — 9 years ago(May 18, 2016 06:58 PM)

Why "all the Catholic Priests"? Are you saying that they are "all" pedophiles? Just interested. Because more sexual abuse has come from Protestant ministers than catholic priests. Also a long history in Islam.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1754777https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1754777Fri, 01 May 2026 04:35:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just caught this again on tv after many years and it's still just as good as always, but I noticed something I may have on Fri, 01 May 2026 04:35:05 GMT]]>McGannahanSkjellyfetti — 10 years ago(April 01, 2016 09:49 PM)

I sure all the Catholic Priests were jacking off of over that scene!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1754776https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1754776Fri, 01 May 2026 04:35:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just caught this again on tv after many years and it's still just as good as always, but I noticed something I may have on Fri, 01 May 2026 04:35:04 GMT]]>AmyJolamb — 10 years ago(March 17, 2016 07:24 PM)

He was two. I just saw an interview with the kid all grown up. He said he was two and thought it was funny.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1754775https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1754775Fri, 01 May 2026 04:35:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just caught this again on tv after many years and it's still just as good as always, but I noticed something I may have on Fri, 01 May 2026 04:35:03 GMT]]>daughterofolaf — 10 years ago(October 22, 2015 01:38 PM)

Jesus Christ. Is there some sort of special group where people like you meet up to discuss the "disturbing" and "inappropriate" things you see in 80's movies and help each other work through your issues?
In case there isn't, might I suggest you start one up and take your issues there instead of bringing them to imdb? If you need a place to start I can help:

  • There's some broad on the Splash board who feels it is outrageous that the movie is rated PG when we see a partial split-second glimpse of a mermaid's breasts under the ocean in a non-sexual setting.
  • There is no shortage of people on the Sixteen Candles board who declare that the movie is racist and offensive.
  • Someone on the Monster Squad board feels that the movie should be edited to remove the word "homo" from the dialogue because it is offensive and if I remember correctly she feels kids don't truly talk that way.
  • A woman (at least I assume it's a woman) on the Die Hard board wants to show that movie to her kid but refuses to do so unless the bad words are edited out. She is okay with extreme violence, execution, gore and blood but the word F V C K is an issue.
    There, you should have a good start at least for your support group. Have fun.
    "Why couldn't the monkey arrange this from INSIDE the garbage can?"
]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1754774https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1754774Fri, 01 May 2026 04:35:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just caught this again on tv after many years and it's still just as good as always, but I noticed something I may have on Fri, 01 May 2026 04:35:02 GMT]]>Elephantlips — 10 years ago(October 01, 2015 07:06 AM)

You're got some issues if you see anything other than a cute little kid.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1754773https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1754773Fri, 01 May 2026 04:35:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just caught this again on tv after many years and it's still just as good as always, but I noticed something I may have on Fri, 01 May 2026 04:35:00 GMT]]>Jack2979 — 10 years ago(September 09, 2015 02:25 PM)

He wasn't 4, he was 2 - big difference. The scene was hilarious. Stop turning it into something bad and dirty for Christ's sake.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1754772https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1754772Fri, 01 May 2026 04:35:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just caught this again on tv after many years and it's still just as good as always, but I noticed something I may have on Fri, 01 May 2026 04:34:59 GMT]]>shiftylee — 10 years ago(August 16, 2015 07:34 PM)

He was 4. What exactly is your issue?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1754771https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1754771Fri, 01 May 2026 04:34:59 GMT