<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[…was 2, 3, 4. 5, 6 or 7 more better, hana?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Prime Suspect</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Premmie</strong> — <em>Yesterday(March 30, 2026 05:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">…was 2, 3, 4. 5, 6 or 7 more better, hana?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/209393/was-2-3-4-5-6-or-7-more-better-hana</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 20:40:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/209393.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 06:41:42 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to …was 2, 3, 4. 5, 6 or 7 more better, hana? on Fri, 01 May 2026 06:41:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>元才</strong> — <em>Yesterday(March 30, 2026 05:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You can pretty much just leave it until<br />
2010<br />
and then pick it up then<br />
It gets complicated when you ask about how Helen Mirren looks, but it's all explained in the one before this</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1761942</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1761942</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 06:41:43 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>