<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs and unpleasant at times.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Back to the Future Part III</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>TalesfromTheCryptfan</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 03, 2016 11:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs and unpleasant at times.<br />
He thought this one was an improvmeent with fun, joy and pure movie making magic.<br />
"What a bunch of slack jawed fags around here"-Predator.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/209677/he-called-part-2-joyless-hardly-any-laughs-and-unpleasant-at-times</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 09:11:03 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/209677.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:14:59 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs and unpleasant at times. on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Woodyanders</strong> — <em>4 years ago(April 23, 2021 01:40 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Fuck that asshole Maltin with a four-pronged pitchfork sideways right up his ass. He's a goddamn straight-arrow stiff MOR nerd.<br />
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763759</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763759</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs and unpleasant at times. on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>grapplernz</strong> — <em>4 years ago(April 22, 2021 04:51 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">To be fair Part II is quite confusing with the alternative timelines if your aren't familiar with the plotline. Part III is a straight forward time travel western.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763758</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763758</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs and unpleasant at times. on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dragson3</strong> — <em>4 years ago(April 11, 2021 01:51 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Leonard Maltin is an idiot and so are you. Part 3 was easily the worst of the 3, no contest.   Steenbergen was absolutely dreadful.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763757</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763757</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs and unpleasant at times. on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lukejbarnett</strong> — <em>4 years ago(April 11, 2021 12:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">yeah and he also hated all the friday the 13th movies so his opinion is null and void and worth nothing. he's an idiot.<br />
if there's one thing we all can agree on it's that this movie is not anywhere near as good as part 1 or part 2.<br />
lukejbarnett</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763756</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763756</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs and unpleasant at times. on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lukejbarnett</strong> — <em>4 years ago(April 11, 2021 12:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">why is it rare to see people put the first film as the weakest bc of how different that sequels are from each other?<br />
lukejbarnett</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763755</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763755</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs and unpleasant at times. on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>pooka5472</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 24, 2016 08:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I wonder how much of the hate for Part 2 has to do with the behind the scenes acrimony going on between Crispin Glover and Bob Gale.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763754</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763754</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs and unpleasant at times. on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>McFly_2015</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 05, 2016 11:49 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The only general consensus is that the first film is better than the third but some western fans still prefer the third. The second and third films are very different. The plot of the second film can be difficult to follow as it heavily explores time travel and can be dark, action packed, and chaotic. The third film is definitely the lightest of the trilogy, its a nice, breezy, simple film. Theres definitely some of the heart from the first film restored in the third. Im sure a lot of people dont like the second film because it doesnt have a happy ending and instead more of a cliffhanger. Rare to see people put the first film as the weakest because of how different the sequels were from each other.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763753</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763753</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs and unpleasant at times. on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TalesfromTheCryptfan</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 28, 2016 11:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Definitely.<br />
"Unicorn, mermaid, vampire,sorceress! No name you'd give her would surprise me i love whom i love"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763752</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763752</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs and unpleasant at times. on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Dan_Garten</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 24, 2016 02:26 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think Part III was Maltin's favorite of the trilogy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763751</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763751</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs and unpleasant at times. on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>pooka5472</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 20, 2016 10:32 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I wonder how much of his opinion on part 2 was influenced by what went on between Crispin Glover and Bob Gale.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763750</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763750</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs and unpleasant at times. on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>buddyboy28</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 18, 2016 11:31 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">He thought this one was an improvement with fun, joy and pure movie making magic<br />
I agree.<br />
He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs, and unpleasant at times<br />
I disagree. I prefer 3 overall but 2's still entertaining. Easily the darkest of the three but still has lots of fun, humour and great ideas.<br />
See if you bastards can do 90</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763749</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763749</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He called part 2 joyless, hardly any laughs and unpleasant at times. on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tutankhaten</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 17, 2016 11:27 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'd completely agree with him.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763748</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763748</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:15:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>