<![CDATA[better than part II]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Back to the Future Part III

acriser15 — 9 years ago(January 30, 2017 10:35 PM)

after seeing them all, i thought this one was better and more enjoyable than part II, anyone agree?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/209694/better-than-part-iiRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 12:31:48 GMTFri, 01 May 2026 07:16:37 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to better than part II on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:16:39 GMT]]>muchmeow — 9 years ago(February 08, 2017 03:21 PM)

Just ignore him. He's rude on every post. Yes, I agree that part 3 is better than part 2. Part 2 is a good segue from 1 to 3, but I can't stand Fox playing theMcFly children, Loraine's "remodeling", or Elizabeth Shue's acting or I should say OVERACTING. Otherwise it's all right, but 3 is MUCH better, and 1 is by far #1 The BEST MOVIE EVER!!!!!!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763840https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763840Fri, 01 May 2026 07:16:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to better than part II on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:16:38 GMT]]>TxMike — 9 years ago(February 01, 2017 07:45 AM)

Why does it matter to you if anyone agrees? It is like saying
"I like Kosher hot dogs better than regular hot dogs, anyone agree?"
It doesn't matter which one you or anyone else likes better, they are a series of (loosely) interconnected movies and wise viewers enjoy each for what it has to offer in escapist entertainment.
Doc

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763839https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1763839Fri, 01 May 2026 07:16:38 GMT