<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Back to the Future 3: Making Gasoline]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Back to the Future Part III</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>TMC-4</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 31, 2016 09:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">NOTE: If you're familiar with the movie, you can skip to the factual question under the ////////s<br />
In the movie<br />
Back to the Future III<br />
, Marty inadvertently punctures the fuel line, spilling all the Delorean's gas into a bear's cave in September of 1885.<br />
This is the main problem in getting Marty back to the future in this film, since the Delorean must reach 88 mph in order for the flux capacitor/time-circuits to do their thing (they still had a working Mr. Fusion to create the 1.21 gigawatts).<br />
////////////////////////<br />
In the film, they have less than a week to overcome this problem: How to get the Delorean up to 88 mph in a world where gasoline is rare, if non-existent.<br />
Yet, petroleum was around.<br />
How plausible might it have been, for someone with a PhD in chemistry, to obtain enough petroleum and convert it into gasoline so the Delorean can accelerate to the required 88 mph, in the wild west of mid-1885?*</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/209738/back-to-the-future-3-making-gasoline</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 19:40:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/209738.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:24:16 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Back to the Future 3: Making Gasoline on Fri, 01 May 2026 07:24:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TxMike</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 01, 2017 08:26 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Not plausible at all.<br />
If you simply distil crude oil and capture the gasoline fraction it would have a very low octane rating, close to zero. Very nice for Jet fuel but not very good for modern high-compression car engines.<br />
The engine of the DeLorean may be able to actually start on such low-octane fuel but if so it would run very poorly right before it blew itself up from excessing knock.<br />
If Doc Brown had a PhD in Chemistry and if he had studied refining and fuel production, a very long shot at that, he would know that he could use the low-octane fuel along with proper catalysts, high-pressure reaction vessels, and a distillation column to make a small amount of high-octane fuel. He might be able to enlist the help of the local blacksmith to make the hardware but he still would not have a source for the catalysts required for the chemical reactions to convert low-octane saturates into high-octane aromatics and branched alkanes like isooctane.<br />
Yes, I am a Chemist and my career was largely in the fuels business, mostly gasoline and jet fuels.<br />
..<em>.. TxMike ..</em>..</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1764259</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1764259</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 07:24:17 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>