<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[And now I get exactly why it has the rating it does.   I&#x27;m not going to get terribly critical but the movie is called lo]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Look Who's Talking Too</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>twik_sliver</strong> — <em>16 years ago(February 14, 2010 12:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">And now I get exactly why it has the rating it does.   I'm not going to get terribly critical but the movie is called look who's talking cause the BABIES TALK TO EACHOTHER AND YOU get a glipse of what a baby would be thinking!! yet they are the focus about 35 percent of the time!! just not as good as 1st one!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/210476/and-now-i-get-exactly-why-it-has-the-rating-it-does-i-m-not-going-to-get-terribly-critical-but-the-movie-is-called-lo</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 20:46:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/210476.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 09:01:32 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>