After having experienced real people like her, hell no.
In reality, anything seemingly nice they do is only for their own gain. Everything's an act. They're hardly human. They should all be beaten to death with metal pigs.

One of the more effective passages of the book is when Paul feels some sympathy for her, because he says that every once in a while, he sees the person she would have been if she weren't so mentally broken. He says that those flashes of humanity in some ways made the ordeal even more difficult for him because he couldn't bring himself to completely hate her. Or something like that.

Tough question. I feel empathy for others. I think we are all suppose to feel empathy. When someone is a psychopath it is a mental illness and I feel sorry for them. But, psychopaths do choices of doing right or wrong just like others. Most psychopaths cover and hide crimes showing they know they did wrong. So I feel no empathy for that. You choose wrong then you pay for it.

no. I felt sympathy for the pained actors in MANIAC and NIGHTMARE
http://www.imdb.com/board/10081114/?ref_=nv_sr_5
http://www.imdb.com/board/10082818/?ref_=fn_al_tt_8

An (implied) baby killer? Of course I don't sympathise with her, mental illness or not
Every man diesnot every man really lives

No- I did feel sorry for her when she said to
PAUL
"You'll never know what it's like for someone like me to lose someone like you" until she pulled out the gun and I remembered how evil she was.
Kathy
's performance was good enough to make me forget for that short period.

It's been a long time since you posted so I'm late to the discussion. I don't really see why we, the viewers, can't feel BOTH sympathy and disgust for her. People are very complex and nobody gets to the point of sheer madness she portrayed without some type of personal traumas in their own history. It's not as cut and dried as "all bad" or "all good" so it doesn't have to make our reactions/empathy mutually exclusive. It would be nice and neat if it was, but it's not. That's why lawyers spend so much time on jury selection. They know that people don't just listen to the facts of a case. A plaintiff's or defendant's age, race, gender, size, occupation, style of dress and all other kinds of factors go "into" how their case is interpreted.
"Get busy living, or get busy dying." (Andy - The Shawshank Redemption)

This message has been deleted.

The thing is, most of the people who post on the IMDb have probably got a lot more in common with Annie (the obsessed fan) than they do with Paul (the creative genius). And that's the sad truth.

Hell no! She was a psychopath. I'm surprised she was not locked away for life after her previous convictions..

I sort of felt sorry for her in that scene were Paul bashed Annie's head in with that metal pig statue. Of course the scene was so sympathetic in delivery with her final sad look and that music playing as she collapses on Paul dead, also for the idea that she will never read the climax to the new Misery book. I think I have that 'I wanted to see the crazy bitch dead by the end' feeling more with Mrs Carmody from The Mist than with Annie Wilkes.

I personally felt sorry for her. Although she did many horrible things I couldn't help but like her. As bad as it sounds she sort of reminded me of myself in that she was rather lonely and got lost in her favorite fictional worlds because she preferred them to the real ones. Other than the killings and violence, I saw a lot of myself in her so that's part of why I could sympathize with her.

She was bipolar obsessive
A-M-E-R-I-C-A! Home of the free, sick and depraved. A-M-E-R-I-C-A! Why the fv*k are you looking @ me

I don't feel bad for her at all. She was at fault for being "trapped" in her own psychosis.
When you boil it all down, it's a result of the fact that she was too weak to face the rejection and harshness of reality. She was never good enough to accomplish anything on her own, so she murdered her way into everything she ever did. Whenever anyone ever threatened (most often completely inadvertently) her warped view of herself/the world, she literally took them out to protect her ego. She is the embodiment of weakness and selfishness.

book-Annie isn't movie-Annie
book-Paul isn't movie-Paul
book-Annie is more like Anne Ramsey than Kathy Bates, much scarier, less human
book-Paul is more like Alan Cummings than James Caan
In the novel, Paul considers writing about his experience, but knows he'd wind up making himself look more heroic than he actually was
I like to think the movie represents Paul's take on himself - he sees himself as James Caan

Yes and no. Mostly no, because, well yeah, she's absolutely psychotic, a remorseless murderer, and scary as all hell. (And if you read the book, you know that she has not only murdered countless hospital patients but her father, several of her neighbours [who had bratty kids she used to babysit], her college roommate, her lover, a young cop [she killed him by beating him within an inch of his life and then RUNNING A LAWNMOWER OVER HIS HEAD], and her cat. The first murder happened when she was, like, 11, too.)
But at the same time I feel bad for her in the same way I feel bad for anybody so trapped by their own psychosis. Annie believes that what she does is right, that she is completely healthy and that she is doing good. Most of her psychotic episodes and moments of cruelty seem to be the doings of a completely different person - not that she's got split-personality disorder, but she really seems to transform into a different Annie when she loses her temper. There's a moment at the end of the book when Paul is attacking her and she stops fighting back, she just looks up at him all confused and betrayed like she's forgotten why she's on the floor and has no idea why he's hurting her. (Then it passes and she starts fighting him again. But still, the moment's there.)
This, of course, doesn't excuse any of her actions. She's still twisted, and I didn't feel sorry for her at ALL by the end.

yeah i felt a bit sorry for her too.
Not when she was getting battered no, she deserved that the crazy bitch. :0)I felt sorry when she bought the type writer, paper etc and then said 'Did i do good?'' I felt like aaah you poor bugger'' she seemed like little child that needed a hug and to be taught whats right and wrong.

Ahh okay, thank you. I thought it seemed weird because they never show him in that scrapbook. I guess it was just assumed that he would be in there.
They also omitted any pictures of her mother. In the novel she had one on the mantelpiece in her home. She was always quoting sayings that her mother used to say to her.

This message has been deleted.

Ahh okay, thank you. I thought it seemed weird because they never show him in that scrapbook. I guess it was just assumed that he would be in there.

I think the husband story was real because in the King novel she was married once upon a time.

I didn't. I think to sympathize with her the whole thing would have to be told from her POV.
And I was thinking she made that whole husband thing up just to make Paul sorry for her, but I dunno.

A little. She was a sick, twisted woman who lived in her own fantasy world and lashed out violently at anyone and anything she saw as a threat to her imaginary bliss. But she was also a pretty pathetic figure, a woman who was so deluded and utterly broken mentally that she shut herself off from the rest of the world and had nothing else to live for except a series of dime store romance novels. I've got to say, though, how Paul got over what she put him through enough to put a semi-positive spin on it is beyond me.

I didn't feel an ounce of sympathy for her. I don't think she got punished enough by Paul. She tortured him, broke his ankles, killed the nice Sheriff, and held him prisoner for weeks. After reading her scrapbook and learning she killed new born babies when she was a nurse, there wasn't enough pain in the world that would be a suitable enough punishment for her.