<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Is this movie really cheesy? I mean I would have expected it to be better overall than the first, having newer technolog]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The NeverEnding Story II: The Next Chapter</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>austin-128</strong> — <em>17 years ago(September 16, 2008 04:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Is this movie really cheesy? I mean I would have expected it to be better overall than the first, having newer technology and all<br />
I still cherish it as a fond child memory but I watched it this morning and was like omg what am I watching.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/210725/is-this-movie-really-cheesy-i-mean-i-would-have-expected-it-to-be-better-overall-than-the-first-having-newer-technolog</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 18:59:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/210725.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 09:43:39 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Is this movie really cheesy? I mean I would have expected it to be better overall than the first, having newer technolog on Fri, 01 May 2026 09:43:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>pferreira86</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 31, 2016 05:11 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's a very underrated sequel and while it does have flaws it's I feel a worthy sequel.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1772069</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1772069</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 09:43:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Is this movie really cheesy? I mean I would have expected it to be better overall than the first, having newer technolog on Fri, 01 May 2026 09:43:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>austin-128</strong> — <em>17 years ago(October 01, 2008 06:51 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">yeah I started to watch the sequel to this and turned it off, I knew it wasn't going to be good.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1772068</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1772068</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 09:43:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Is this movie really cheesy? I mean I would have expected it to be better overall than the first, having newer technolog on Fri, 01 May 2026 09:43:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>guns_n_roses8487</strong> — <em>17 years ago(September 20, 2008 07:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">But you do have to take into account how old this movie is, it's nearly 20 years old. It came out 6 years after the original, but remember that technology moved slower in those days, today is so much different (to the point of not being able to keep up). As for being cheesy, well the 80's and early 90's was THE era of cheesiness. The biggest mistake made in regards to this series was making a follow-up to this one, now that was a God awful sequel.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1772067</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1772067</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 09:43:40 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>