<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[If the script was uninspired and nothing special, and the filmmakers just saw this just a sequel &quot;product&quot;, there&#x27;s no w]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The NeverEnding Story II: The Next Chapter</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>virgiltx</strong> — <em>13 years ago(December 30, 2012 11:31 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If the script was uninspired and nothing special, and the filmmakers just saw this just a sequel "product", there's no way that the actors could save it.<br />
It's pointless to criticize the acting of the main three plus Clarissa Burt. Their parts were so thinly written, how can you discern acting failure from character-development failure? And there's the factor of the direction. How many takes were done to get a good performance? How thoughtful was the editing process?<br />
The acting seemed to reflect a malaise that must have come from higher up.</p>
<hr />
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/210733/if-the-script-was-uninspired-and-nothing-special-and-the-filmmakers-just-saw-this-just-a-sequel-product-there-s-no-w</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 17:53:46 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/210733.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 09:44:34 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to If the script was uninspired and nothing special, and the filmmakers just saw this just a sequel &quot;product&quot;, there&#x27;s no w on Fri, 01 May 2026 09:44:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>pferreira86</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 31, 2016 05:00 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If the script was uninspired and nothing special, and the filmmakers just saw this just a sequel "product", there's no way that the actors could save it.<br />
Totally disagree. The third one was a cash in. The second was done with a lot of love and attention.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1772119</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1772119</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 09:44:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to If the script was uninspired and nothing special, and the filmmakers just saw this just a sequel &quot;product&quot;, there&#x27;s no w on Fri, 01 May 2026 09:44:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>All_Seeing_I</strong> — <em>12 years ago(June 23, 2013 08:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I even thought John Wesley Shipp did a great job, at least considering the stereotypical and somewhat bland character he was written as. (Still the best character arc in the film, oddlyBastian's was a bit confused and just too rushed and poorly done). Even Brandis, who mostly overacts, has a few genuine moments with Shipp.<br />
You could tell Burt was just having fun with the role. She probably knew it was dreck and just wanted to give a deliciously hammy performance. I don't fault her in the slightest.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1772118</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1772118</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 09:44:35 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>