<![CDATA[Was Christine Lakin Underutilized?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Step by Step

crmdgn1 — 9 years ago(July 16, 2016 06:38 AM)

Just wondering what people think.
I haven't watched this show since it originally aired, so I don't really remember exactly how much screen time she got, but I believe she'd be #6 in the cast pecking order (would have been #7 if Sasha Mitchell stayed on).
However any time Step by Step is mentioned, it seems to me like the conversation is usually about Al. I think she's quite possibly the most fondly remembered character, generally speaking.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/211013/was-christine-lakin-underutilizedRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 23:05:51 GMTFri, 01 May 2026 10:23:47 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Was Christine Lakin Underutilized? on Fri, 01 May 2026 10:23:50 GMT]]>eswart79 — 9 years ago(August 19, 2016 06:08 PM)

When she started to develop she looked like she'd be quite well endowed, guess she started early or they had her wearing a good padded bra.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1774330https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1774330Fri, 01 May 2026 10:23:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Was Christine Lakin Underutilized? on Fri, 01 May 2026 10:23:49 GMT]]>Brooklyn329 — 9 years ago(August 05, 2016 08:22 AM)

IMO she was used quite adequately, and to good effect. And yes, her character was great. I think she and Staci Keanan were the two best actors on the show amongst the children, and on a superficial note Lakin underwent one of the more notable physical transformations in TV history. Al was great.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1774329https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1774329Fri, 01 May 2026 10:23:49 GMT